this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
198 points (98.5% liked)

politics

23989 readers
3160 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 89 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Of course they are! They've engineered their appliances to get the energy star label. If that label disappears they lose their investment because that label will no longer be there to quickly distinguish the efficient products.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yup. Trump also removed the requirement limiting the amount of water a toilet can use to flush and no manufacturers cared. They already changed their designs and factories to produce efficient models. Why would they change it all just to make stuff that's worse?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lower water use also means you can get that extra bathroom you wanted.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Less money on water to use on other shit yeah why not.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's the partni really don't understand. Trump wants people and companies to spend a lot of extra money to get back the shitty products from the past. Why?

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cause energy efficiency is woke, probably.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If you acknowledge that climate change is real, then clearly you’ve been infected by those dirty leftist commies

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The inefficient models will be unsellable outside of the US, and the efficient models from elsewhere will be unsellable in the US due to tariffs.

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So basically the US will have inferior goods like the Eastern block and it's Trabants.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

They argued that ending Energy Star labeling would go against Trump’s stated goal of bringing down energy prices.

Haven’t they learned anything? Just because Trump says he wants to do something does not mean he’ll do it. Most especially anything beneficial to anybody but him and his entourage of cock suckers.