this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
464 points (99.6% liked)

Trippin' Through Time

4561 readers
1 users here now

Tripping' Through Time

A Lemmy community for historic art pieces overhauled into modern memes.

Rules

  1. Only image uploads allowed
  2. Only edited, historical images may be shared
  3. The instance rules of https://lemmy.ca/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If they keep feeding him, maybe one day they'll be as rich as he is.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

Or even better: pizza party!

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But if we dismantle the system of everyone feeding him, then I won't get the same treatment when I'm no longer temporarily embarrassed after my garage tech bro startup takes off! (This is sarcasm.)

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Upvoted, but also PSA:

Focusing on CEO salaries establishes a goal that shareholders can easily (and moreover want to) meet, but it’s the shareholders themselves pulling the strings who must be held to account.

Yes, some CEOs are majority shareholders as well, often those one can name, but they are the exception. Most CEOs are outside hires meant to oversee and take responsibility for a specific agenda (e.g. mergers, layoffs, rebranding initiatives, etc) and the list of CEOs far exceeds that of the actual 0.1% who are toppling democracies and poisoning wells.

Most importantly, shareholders love it when you blame their CEOs for stuff, because they’re paid for that: to be disposable liability magnets. The golden parachutes are hazard pay, an indication of a job well done. Please do pay more attention to the man behind the curtain.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago

Second PSA: if you want to find the evil, look at the consulting companies. Shareholders benefit, consulting companies like McKinsey come up with ideas like layoffs or return to office and convince shareholders across the board it will make money

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The outside-hires-CEO model is what led to "locusts" imo: CEOs that prioritize short-term profit (usually layoffs) no matter the long-term costs, so their golden parachute gets bigger, and then moves on.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

If CEOs really were this large it prolly would be justified to pay them more. This dude prolly eats $10,000 food a day

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gulliver, isn't it about time that you maybe... maybe went home?

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does this look like a man who had all he could eat?

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

That could have been me!

When a man tells you that he got rich through hard work, ask him whose.

  • Eric Reguly
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Doin my part paying tariff fees to make sure that bonus doesn't drop at all too! We all gotta chip in.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Workers dont choose a CEO, the shareholders do via the board of directors.

If you were as smart as the CEO and could run a company you would probably be a CEO yourself, they arent gifting any average idiot millions of dollars for nothing.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We need cooperatives

[–] Abrinoxus@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is this genius artwork and who dunnit

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I think this is "Gargantua" by François Rabelais