this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
172 points (98.9% liked)

Asklemmy

47845 readers
993 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The worst corp I can think of is Nestlé, these pieces of shit have done a lot of environmental damage and have been known to engage or complicit in slavery.

Erasing Nestlé is like erasing the infectious boil on a human body.

What foul company would you erase for good and why?

(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I did think of Nestle as well, and another one, Tata. They're infamous for stealing land belonging to indigenous people in India. In 2006, the state police of the Orissa government shot 12 people, including a child, in a crowd protesting state-sponsored land grabbing. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/asa200012007en.pdf

The most iron-rich part of India, Bastar, is also the poorest, and with the most number of Maoist militias. This is no coincidence. Tribal people make up only 9% of the country’s population, but more than 40% of the land used to build 'development' projects belonged originally to them. The most mineral rich areas in India, and the world, are some of the poorest because the industries are not publicly owned.

To be honest, I can think of much, much worse. Union Carbide, Adani, Aveo, which was funding a drug epidemic in Nigeria, they're all bad. There's no good capitalist.

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean, all that are privately owned. A system that puts profit above all else will never have any corporation that acts ethically and in the interest of society.

But I also wanna mention, Nestlé isn't a particularly evil corporation. It's just the only food corporation where we know these things they've been up to but you can be damn sure the others aren't any better.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'd argue the publicly owned ones are actually the bigger problems. At least with privately owned ones there's usually a single individual or small group of individuals that can be influenced threatened and held accountable, or what passes for accountability these days. With publicly own companies though there's this concept of the nebulous shareholder. There's such a wide range of people who own the shares of the company that they are untouchable yet at the same time completely ignorable. Companies don't have to answer to the shareholders because the shareholders don't feel involved enough or care enough to actually speak out. Instead it's the concept of the shareholder. Which is actually more dangerous. That anonymity makes it a more brutal and ravenous concept. Private companies are able to think more long term because the private owner is able to think long-term, or longer rather, where is publicly owned companies that Anonymous shareholder concept requires constant unending and immediate growth. Which is a cancerous concept. For society and the planet both.

Not that either is good of course, just that one's more dangerous. Also Nestle is very very evil, publicly owned by the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoomProphet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

Every advertise company. I believe the world would be better if people would stop trying to sell other people stuff they don't need.

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Maybe Goldman Sachs. Manipulation of many markets, both contributed to and profited from the 2008 crash. Which they paid a $550mil settlement for when they're like a $100bil company. Imagine making $50k a year, committing fraud ("misleading its investors") at a national scale affecting millions, and getting fined $250.

Also manipulation of gas prices, food supply/prices, insider trading, they're just the freaking worst.

[–] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago
[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 5 points 4 days ago
[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Nestle and it's not even close.

[–] CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 days ago

All of them

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Nobody gonna at least honorable mention Walmart? It's been a bane on local small business from the start, but it's also been funnelling wealth out of communities.

When employees have to both live off assistance AND can only afford to ship at Walmart with their employee discount, more wealth goes to Walmart than they ever pay the employee and the community just gets poorer all the meanwhile.

[–] q181c@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

There are a lot of extremely strong candidates, but I’m gonna go with Meta on this one.

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 3 points 4 days ago
[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Congress. Oh you said corporations, not their property, my bad.

[–] andrewth09@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Well you might not have to wait much longer.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 days ago

So. Many. Choices. Not sure I can pick one.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I know everyone always says Nestlé in threads like this but what are they still doing? What damage would you save by getting rid of them?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›