this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
255 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

69298 readers
4106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

An alarming number of people can't read over a 6th grade level.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

An alarming number of them believe that they are conscious too, when they show no signs of it.

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

I checked the source and I can't find their full report or even their methodology.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think an alarming number of Gen Z internet folks find it funny to skew the results of anonymous surveys.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, what is it with GenZ? Millenials would never skew the results of anonymous surveys

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Right? Just insane to think that Millenials would do that. Now let me read through this list of Time Magazines top 100 most influential people of 2009.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago

I wish philosophy was taught a bit more seriously.

An exploration on the philosophical concepts of simulacra and eidolons would probably change the way a lot of people view LLMs and other generative AI.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same generation who takes astrology seriously, I’m shocked

[–] CoolMatt@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Taking astrology seripusly isn't a gen z only thing, where hve you been?

Lots of people lack critical thinking skills

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 79 points 3 days ago (25 children)

The LLM peddlers seem to be going for that exact result. That's why they're calling it "AI". Why is this surprising that non-technical people are falling for it?

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is an angle I've never considered before, with regards to a future dystopia with a corrupt AI running the show. AI might never advance beyond what it is in 2025, but because people believe it's a supergodbrain, we start putting way too much faith in its flawed output, and it's our own credulity that dismantles civilisation rather than a runaway LLM with designs of its own. Misinformation unwittingly codified and sanctified by ourselves via ChatGeppetto.

The call is coming from inside the ~~house~~ mechanical Turk!

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 2 days ago

They call it hallucinations like it's a cute brain fart, and "Agentic" means they're using the output of one to be the input of another, which has access to things and can make decisions and actually fuck things up. It's a complete fucking shit show. But humans are expensive so replacing them makes line go up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 39 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Lots of attacks on Gen Z here, some points valid about the education that they were given from the older generations (yet it's their fault somehow). Good thing none of the other generations are being fooled by AI marketing tactics, right?

The debate on consciousness is one we should be having, even if LLMs themselves aren't really there. If you're new to the discussion, look up AI safety and the alignment problem. Then realize that while people think it's about preparing for a true AGI with something akin to consciousness and the dangers that we could face, we have have alignment problems without an artificial intelligence. If we think a machine (or even a person) is doing things because of the same reasons we want them done, and they aren't but we can't tell that, that's an alignment problem. Everything's fine until they follow their goals and the goals suddenly line up differently than ours. And the dilemma is - there's not any good solutions.

But back to the topic. All this is not the fault of Gen Z. We built this world the way it is and raised them to be gullible and dependent on technology. Using them as a scapegoat (those dumb kids) is ignoring our own failures.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’ve been hearing a lot about gen z using them for therapists, and I find that really sad and alarming.

AI is the ultimate societal yes man. It just parrots back stuff from our digital bubble because it’s trained on that bubble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blinsane@reddthat.com 20 points 2 days ago (12 children)

It's likely they don't know what the word "conscious" means

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

In fairness, the word "conscious" has a range of meanings. For some, it is synonymous with certain religious ideas. They would be alarmed by the "heresy". For others, it is synonymous to claiming that some entity is entitled to the same fundamental rights as a human being. Those would be quite alarmed by the social implications. Few people use the term in a strictly empiricist sense.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

An alarming number of Hollywood screenwriters believe consciousness (sapience, self awareness, etc.) is a measurable thing or a switch we can flip.

At best consciousness is a sorites paradox. At worst, it doesn't exist and while meat brains can engage in sophisticated cognitive processes, we're still indistinguishable from p-zombies.

I think the latter is more likely, and will reveal itself when AGI (or genetically engineered smart animals) can chat and assemble flat furniture as well as humans can.

(On mobile. Will add definition links later.) << Done!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] coffeeismydrug@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

to be honest they probably wish it was conscious because it has more of a conscience than conservatives and capitalists

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They also are the dumbest generation with a COVID education handicap and the least technological literacy in terms of mechanics comprehension. They have grown up with technology that is refined enough to not need to learn troubleshooting skills past "reboot it".

How they don't understand that a LLM can't be conscious is not surprising. LLMs are a neat trick, but far from anything close to consciousness or intelligence.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

An Alarming Number of Anyone Believes Fortune Cookies

Just ... accept it, superstition is in human nature. When you take religion away from them, they need something, it'll either be racism/fascism, or expanding conscience via drugs, or belief in UFOs, or communism at least, but they need something.

The last good one was the digital revolution, globalization, world wide web, all that, no more wars (except for some brown terrorists, but the rest is fine), everyone is free and civilized now (except for those with P*tin as president and other such types, but it's just an imperfect democracy don't you worry), SG-1 series.

Anything changing our lives should have an intentionally designed religious component, or humans will improvise that where they shouldn't.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I wasn't aware the generation of CEOs and politicians was called "Gen Z".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

If they mistake those electronic parrots for conscious intelligencies, they probably won't be the best judges for rating such things.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago (22 children)

That's a matter of philosophy and what a person even understands "consciousness" to be. You shouldn't be surprised that others come to different conclusions about the nature of being and what it means to be conscious.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›