this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
213 points (99.1% liked)

Uplifting News

14614 readers
279 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

I wonder how they handle vultures.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 88 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It’s a food pantry funded by donations.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is probably area dependent, but it’s fairly common for food pantries to give you a bag of random food. They usually try to group things that make sense and that people use and want, but they can only give out what’s been donated and what you get is what you get. Letting people actually pick and choose what they want both reduces waste and gives a sense of normalcy.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also it's why it's great to donate food but if you can donating money goes a long way further as the good bank can buy so much more food with the same amount of money that you can. The small amount I donate every month feeds about 20 people.

I have also done sorting at a food bank and you wouldn't believe how much spoiled food is donated. Like the oldest box was from the 70s. Food banks loose in opportunity costs while volunteers have to spend their time throwing that stuff away and the effort to haul it off vs giving cash directly to farmers and suppliers to provide crates of good but ugly produce and tones of frozen and can food.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Like the oldest box was from the 70s

And......what's the story here? Did grandma just die, and the family are clearing out her cellar and found green giant canned goods from back when the green giant actually still looked like a villain who spends all day in the gym???

....now I'm thinking about gyms for giants. You'd have green giant, the giant from jack and the beanstalk, the stay puffd marshmellow man. I never realized how many giants are food related. Now I want a marshmellow bean and a marshmellow beanstalk. IT WOULD BE SO FLUFFY AND DELICIOUS!!!

.....what were we talking about again?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

here it used to be an (for a single or 2 person household) overflowing banana box of stuff (sometimes two) a week, usually close or past-dated. with a lot of sad looking produce and almost always a package or two of meat (like ham, ground beef, sometimes nice steaks though).

now it's often not enough to fill a single paper grocery bag, and never any meat. they see a lot more 'business' these days than 5-10 years ago. there is not enough to go around.

there's a 'store like' pantry too (can choose a certain quantity from each 'department'). you can 'shop' every month--but it has stricter qualifications than the weekly random distributions.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

The counter argument that picking and choosing creates a sense of priority and "missing out". Because even if you didn't actually want the canned peaches (NOBODY wants canned peaches), you are worried that the person ahead of you got it. Which tends to lead toward discontent or outright discouragement amongst those who "don't really need it and are doing fine".

Whereas the box of food set aside by the volunteers? Half of you got canned peaches and the other half canned beets. While people are annoyed they got the god awful peaches, they at least feel better because "everyone is in this together" and so forth.

Charity is a shockingly hard problem because so many people will insist they don't actually need any help and so many things can create a barrier to make them decide it isn't worth their time or the hit to their pride. And different models tend to appeal to different people. But, from talking to some of the organizers at a food bank I used to volunteer at a couple years ago, the "take what you need" model tends to pull in more "dumpster diving college kids" rather than "actual people in need". But I suspect a lot of that is also a function of it having been in a college town.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

I love canned peaches..

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Wdym, canned peaches are nice : (

I got mine from a regular shop though

[–] mat@linux.community 6 points 2 days ago

Have you had a bad experience with canned peaches? I volunteered at a food bank a while back and we each had our station and gave out what people asked from that category (types of bread, fruits, etc). I don't recall seeing canned peaches or folks' reaction to them, but I'll be on the lookout next time!

[–] Gecko4469@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hell yeah canned peaches. I agree though too there’s weird things that make charity a hard problem

(Not) peachy.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Except with way more dignity

[–] Hellinabucket@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

So are most food pantries.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

Ah, that makes sense. I was wondering how the stores were paying for the stock, the upkeep, taxes, etc.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It's not socialism, it's, uh... People-first capitalism.