this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
532 points (98.7% liked)

World News

45416 readers
4183 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Russia was excluded from Trump’s sweeping tariff list due to existing U.S. sanctions that limit trade, White House officials claimed.

Despite lower trade volumes, countries like Syria were still included, prompting skepticism.

Trump has prioritized ending the war in Ukraine and threatened 50% tariffs on nations buying Russian oil. Russian state media framed the omission as sanctions-based, not favoritism, with some mocking Trump’s harsher stance on allies.

Ukraine, meanwhile, faces a 10% tariff despite the country’s strategic partnership with the U.S.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 34 points 23 hours ago

Uninhabited islands: tariffs

Allies: tariffs

Israel: believe it or not, tariffs

Russia: crickets

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Strange, what reason did the USA give for economically attacking all of their trading partners except Russia and Russia's close allies?

[–] Washedupcynic@lemm.ee 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Wiz@midwest.social 2 points 20 hours ago

Our trade with the penguins were also zero. We terriffed the penguins anyway!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

Who cares, its just lies anyway.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 117 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He certainly isn't trying to beat those "Russian asset" allegations is he?

[–] elvith@feddit.org 24 points 1 day ago

What? Comrade Krasnov? A Russian asset? Never!

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg

Julius Rosenberg (May 12, 1918 – June 19, 1953) and Ethel Rosenberg (née Greenglass; September 28, 1915 – June 19, 1953) were an American married couple who were convicted of spying for the Soviet Union, including providing top-secret information about American radar, sonar, jet propulsion engines, and nuclear weapon designs. Convicted of espionage in 1951, they were executed by the federal government of the United States in 1953 using New York's state execution chamber in Sing Sing in Ossining,[1] New York

America used to have standards.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny you bring up that couple, because the lack of standards has a through line here.

A man named Roy Cohn was the prosecutor, and he wheeled and dealed to make sure that both Rosenbergs got the death penalty, even if the evidence was a bit weak, especially the evidence against Ethel. Cohn got witnesses to change their story so that he could push to kill Ethel.

Cohn then went on to help Joseph McCarthy run the Red, and Lavender Scares.

And then, later still, Roy Cohn would tutor Donald Trump in the art of personally attacking anyone who tried to enforce the law against him.

The piece of shit finally died of HIV,

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

TIL, thank you

[–] Flemmy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

And a whole nation's gotta take it in the behind for this. Classic king of the hill stuff.

[–] gargolito@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

The island populated by penguins has to pay tariffs but not Russia. Ok

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 day ago

But uninhabited islands are

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn't because of sanctions or not doing any trade with Russia, this bears repeating from the article:

However, nations with even less trade with the US - such as Syria, which exported $11m of products last year according to UN data quoted by Trading Economics - were on the list.

According to the Office of the US Trade Representative, the US imported goods from Russia worth $3.5bn (£2.7bn) in 2024. It mainly consisted of fertilisers, nuclear fuel and some metals, according to Trading Economics and Russian media.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago

If I'm a politician and I'm putting tariffs in place, the one place getting annihilated by a 1,000% tariff is the place I've already sanctioned into the ground. Is that performative? Maybe. Would it prevent headlines like this? Yep.

Makes you wonder what's going on in the swamp.

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All that time and money invested in agent Krasnov is really paying off.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Trump is a Russian loving traitor.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sanctions limits trade? but countries with hardly any trade with US are getting tariffs.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Lesotho - 50%, Saint Pierre & Miquelon - 50%.

But seriously, American consumers should say bye bye to cheap clothes, etc. as everything there is about to get a lot more expensive. The reality is that America was prospering in parts to all those third world countries. And it is kind of stupid to think that you can replace their products with local manufacturing as you lack both the skill set on the local work force nor the salary levels.

They also kicked all their immigrants who were working those shitty low paid jobs and I am sure as hell those employers are now struggling big time to find other people willing to do the same for the same pay.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Interesting to see what would happen. Prices of goods in US will go up due to tariffs, similar locally made good will be expensive too due to local cost of manufacturing, labor.

Meanwhile consumer in the rest of the world are enjoying life buying cheap clothes and electronics made in SEA, China, s.america and etc.

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Read all about it in this month’s riveting issue of Duh.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Cuba, Belarus and North Korea were also not included

At least they're being consistent. If Biden had excluded Russia along with those countries from some global economic policy, I wouldn't be suspicious.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's probably dumber than you think why they weren't on there. The formula they used to come up with the countries tarrifs rate is based simply on trade deficit calculations. So if you aren't exporting/importing from those countries they wouldn't be included. It doesn't even matter if there was a trade surplus.

For example, take the figures for China:

  • Goods trade deficit: $291.9bn
  • Total goods imports: $438.9bn
  • 291.9/438.9 = 0.67, or 67%
  • And halved = 34%

Sources:

https://www.ft.com/content/e025d7e6-512d-4e82-9c25-7900b94ac153

https://news.sky.com/story/do-trumps-tariff-numbers-add-up-after-liberation-day-announcement-13340903

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/03/trumps-idiotic-and-flawed-tariff-calculations-stun-economists

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This can't explain the exclusion of Russia, since the entirely uninhabited Heard and McDonald Islands got their own entry on the list. There cannot be a trade balance with a place where nobody lives. The islands got the "base rate" of 10%, so for Russia to have been excluded there has to have been another reason

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Honestly they probably plugged it into Grok and asked it to spit out the list of countries to tariff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

You know what other place has limited trace but still got hit with tariffs? Heard Island and Mcdonald Island since they are uninhabited.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

"What? That can't be so..."

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shocked I say. Shocked that Putin's puppet is not putting Tariffs on someone that is trying to take over another country.

load more comments
view more: next ›