this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
264 points (99.3% liked)

DRM

144 readers
1 users here now

A community for the discussion of topics surrounding DRM, Digital Rights Management.

All media that DRM can be applied on can be discussed here, for example books, movies, music or games.

Digital rights management (DRM) is the management of legal access to digital content. Various tools or technological protection measures, such as access control technologies, can restrict the use of proprietary hardware and copyrighted works. DRM technologies govern the use, modification and distribution of copyrighted works (e.g. software, multimedia content) and of systems that enforce these policies within devices. DRM technologies include licensing agreements and encryption.

Wikipedia

Guides and useful tools

Quick and dirty way to rip an eBook from Android

2025 Guide for freeing books from Amazon (after D&T was removed)

Guide to Removing DRM From Amazon Kindle E-Books

Liberate your Kindle books before leaving Amazon (Tutorial)

How to setup Calibre to remove DRM from ebooks on Linux/Archive mirror

Guide on removing DRM from Kobo & Kindle eBooks (reddit mirror, Archive link)

Extracting content from an LCP "protected" ePub

DeDRM tools for eBooks: a plugin for Calibre for removing Adobe DRM, Obok etc.

Calibre eBook Management

Miscellaneous links

DRM - Frequently Asked Questions by DefectiveByDesign

Guide to DRM-Free Living by DefectiveByDesign

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 

If rolled out widely, this would make web browsers and third-party YouTube clients without a DRM license unusable for YouTube playback, download, etc. This would include almost all open-source web browsers and almost all third-party YouTube clients. Archive link to reddit post about this

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

Its a shame that content creators don't truly own the content on YouTube and can simply opt out of DRM on their videos.

Also weird timing considering boycotting is a common topic right now.

[–] melfie@lemmings.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I’m sitting here reading this as my spouse watches the stock YouTube client with ads on a TV that also has SmartTubeNext installed. Evidently, the ads are preferable over a less refined UX when you’re less neurodivergent and don’t jolt out of your seat whenever a stupid, loud ad comes on. As much as I’d like to say DRM will kill YouTube, objectively speaking, it probably won’t. What it may do instead is kill YouTube clients with better accessibility for neurodivergent folks like SmartTubeNext.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I've been thinking about using Nebula. Does anyone has any experience with it?

[–] 2deck@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Its got some great creators, Ive been on there a couple of years. Only downside which some might be glad to be rid of is a lack of comments, and feedback. Without any interaction you're just watching videos; doesn't feel like a community or conversation.

Seems a shame because there are creators who appear to value the voice of the community on a platform where their audience has no voice.

There's a thread from five years ago where a founder Dave Wiskus said they had plans for a thread-like comments section. So it's weird; must not align with whatever else it is they're doing.

I'd say the same thing about dropout TV. How can we get in the comments without a comments section!?

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 4 points 6 days ago

Dropout really needs some way to interact, even if it's just a shared fanmail address. I don't think my view counts make it clear how much I appreciate some of their content and talent.

I tried to contact Grant O'Brien through Twitter (made an account specifically for that), but it didn't look like he was very active at all, probably got more interesting stuff going on. But no artist is too busy to read fanmail, right?

[–] lapping6596@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I think they don't want to own moderation of it. Which I get, but ultimately feel the same way you do. I'm happy I'm on there, few years as well, but do wish they had a comment section.

[–] KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

No comments? You might have just sold me on it.

[–] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

For the comments, I use grayjay with nebula's plug-in so there's the polycentric comments, but there's very little of them.

[–] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

Wonderful service. Nice, educative sometimes, and entertaining videos. Mixes well with grayjay/my other subscriptions on youtube/odysee.

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Been on Nebula (with curiosity stream) for 4 years. They're great. Good price, many of my favorite YT creators are also on Nebula, and their Nebula content either drops first, or has extended cuts and no ads ever.

They definitely have less channels and stuff overall, but a much larger percentage of their content is geared towards my interests. Also, I would say their minimum quality and production values are significantly higher than YT.

[–] JakobFel@retrolemmy.com 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

More than ever, people need to start using alternatives. I recommend Odysee. It has a couple issues that they're apparently working on but it's easily the best overall alternative.

[–] dontbelasagne@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Youtube Alternatives are only going to start taking off is that alternative is willing to pay content creators enough for them at least a liveable wage. And it needs to be stable Odysee's payment system relies on other people and tips are unstable at the best of times. A youtube alternative has got to have a better payment system than relying on strangers to tip the creator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingOogaBooga@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Google is also experimenting with my not using YouTube any more.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

This kills the YouTube. Maybe not quickly, but it will be a large nail in the coffin should they double down on it.

[–] Simyon@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

I pay for Premium and if they actually do this I'll stop my subscription. Web DRM is stupid and I hate that other Streaming Services already have it. Apart from being another resource sink in browsers, it'll stop third party clients which I use and it also turns off Nvidia Shadowplay which is annoying as it doesn't automatically turn back on once the DRM content is no longer loaded.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I use youtube for mediocre garbage content to fill airspace. I don't need it. I would be better off without it. Don't push me google, because I'll fucking jump.

I already jumped off of a number of their other services, what's one more?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Funny enough they used to use their own video playback codec which had to be cracked in order for downloaders to work, so technically they've been doing DRM for a long long time.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 6 days ago

In a way this enshittificication is necessary to make the replacement possible. Whatever it will be.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If they do this my watching 2 hours a day with YouTube Premier is over. I will not subject myself to advertising.

[–] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The number one reason I use YouTube is for fitness routines I can do at home (going to a physical gym means I will not workout), and keeping up on finance news. I will gladly find other ways to get this information. I just use YouTube because it’s the easiest and has all of the people I like in one place.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 6 days ago

I'll pay for deezer or apple music if I have to, lol

I've almost completely quit youtube. Go ahead drive in that final nail.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Nice! C ya later then! 😂😂

load more comments
view more: next ›