this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
340 points (94.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

38233 readers
1615 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They sell things that come in cups, or with napkins. Lots of people cycle/run/walk here instead of driving, seems pretty stupid.

Taking away the bins doesn't mean you don't produce rubbish....

Edit: I think there is still a bin IN the cafe, but most people eat/drink outside. Lots of people asking staff where the bins are. Still hypocritical I think though? (And still mildly infuriating to remove well used bins!)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HorseFD@lemmy.world 13 points 1 hour ago

This is the reason given in Australia by Parks Victoria

LEAVE NO TRACE

Advocate for minimal-impact practices wherever you go. Many people are surprised to find no bins in national parks. Waste attracts native animals, which can change their natural behaviour and harm both natural and cultural sites, as well as your personal belongings.

Always bring rubbish bags (and one for your neighbour) and take all your rubbish home. Help educate others about the importance of leaving the park pristine, minimising your impact on the delicate balance of the ecosystem.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 17 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

I'd give this some odds of reducing trash pollution. It can seem frustrating, but it MAY change people's behavior in a way that reduces litter. Behavioral economics can be counterintuitive.

EDIT: What matters is the result. If this makes more people litter, they should probably bring back the bins. If this reduces litter, they should keep it this way, regardless of how inconvenient or "stupid" you the reader find it.

[–] bali10050@lemmy.world 31 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

No. Most people just start littering when there's no trash bins nearby.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 9 points 2 hours ago

Think of the stupidest person you know, etc etc.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They're shit people. I take cans home to recycle because we don't have proper recycling at my workplace.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

Yes, they are. But that does not make it better that there is no bin. I have been in a situation with no bin but trash that can not simply be carried (disgusting liquid) and had to dump it. That is extremely rare for me, I usually pick up others trash. But there are situations where you simply need a bin, no matter how green you are.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If you operate a business that sells things in paper plates and wrappers, you certainly have a moral responsibility to have waste receptacles to collect those waste products.

The problem isn't that a park lacks trash cans. The problem is that a cafe removed their trash bins.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

The he cafe still has bins inside, they have a way to collect their refuse.

The park removed the bins since people from the cafe weee likely overfilling it.

Where does the sign say the cafe removed them…? The sign is from the ministry of forestry and speaks only for what they did. Remove the park bins.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I feel the same way, but about places that sell coffee having an obligation to provide a public bathroom.

Glares angrily at 7-11

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

Let us sing praise for the Rhineland Palatinatian Landesverordnung zur Ausführung des Gaststättengesetzes (Gaststättenverordnung - GastVO -), in effect since 1971, which mandates one toilet each for males and females in every restaurant or pub, and more for larger establishments.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 hours ago

It's like my university campus removing all ashtrays to stop people from smoking.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 hours ago

That's not how this works.

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 100 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I used to work for the Woodland Trust and believe that this is the right thing to do. Bins in woodlands do not get emptied often and will often overflow and attract unwanted pests like rats. Rats will also eat the eggs of ground nesting birds and cause other environmental issues.

If they are selling food on site then the food vendor should have a bin that their customers can use inside their cabin/cafe and dispose of the waste daily as part of the service.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Just take your garbage home.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 48 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Bins in woodlands do not get emptied often and will often overflow

Think I found the problem— why not do the obvious thing and empty them more often?

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because that would mean employing someone to empty them regularly, and as most woodland is few and far between in this country most woodland owners deem that an unnecessary expense.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There’s a cafe and forestry workers, is it that time consuming?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And how do they get the garbage to the dump? You would need vehicles, insurance, garage, maintenance departments… it all snowballs.

Just be responsible for your own garbage, not a hard concept.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 1 points 42 minutes ago

The cafe will have a contract with someone to take away waste, this waste could be included.

I totally agree people should take away rubbish that they create, unfortunately many dont.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Genuine answer here, as someone who volunteers for the parks. A lot of times the budgets are tight, depending on whose responsibility it is to clean up the area and what services are there/nearby, the staffing just isn't available. Yeah it's a pretty easy thing to do in theory, but in practice when it becomes "okay and 2 hours of your shift is driving out there and emptying the cans" it's not a far leap to just "Remove the cans, make the snack stand dispose of their garbage on their own"

I mean I get it, the cans are nice but also, like you're an adult. Throw your trash away on your own.

"But then people will throw it on the ground!" Okay then pay someone to stand out there and slap every idiot that thinks littering is okay because they couldn't find a can in 10 seconds.

It's common decency in plenty of places around the world to take your garbage with you until you find a can. It's not hard.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

It’s common decency in plenty of places around the world to take your garbage with you until you find a can.

But you've removed all the cans rather than fix your budgeting problems.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (9 children)

Who’s gonna do it and pay for it?

If people weren’t such babies and cleaned up after themselves, we wouldn’t need to waste taxpayers money on cleaning up after adults who could do it themselves.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

I dunno about you, but if I see a bin in a public area, I assume some is paid to empty it. I don’t empty it myself.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Who’s gonna do it and pay for it?

Sounds like there's a bunch of people and some kind of organisation that runs this area, after all, they made the decision to take the bins away. This is also a cafe area, so someone's making money off this zone.

THOSE PEOPLE ARE.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 19 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (7 children)

This is right by the cafe/site office/car park though. The reception desk is about 20m to the left and staffed during daylight hours year round.

Not like it's in the middle of nowhere.

I get your point, there are very few bins elsewhere (mostly by the other car parks) and that's fine. It's just that the place that gives you rubbish makes it hard to responsibly get rid of it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 87 points 6 hours ago (8 children)

Gentrified forest is the most cursed phrase I heard in a minute.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] liv@lemmy.nz 18 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

This has been happening in New Zealand for a while. The theory seems to be that bins attract more litter and are a hazard to wildlife.

I was sceptical at first but it actually seems to work.

Perturbs me that they are selling food though. Surely yhe food sellers should have bins for which they are responsible in their immediate vicinity.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

I don't think it works. I think the resulting litter is just more distributed and therefore harder to register. Instead of an overflowing trash can, it's a napkin here, a cup there, and a lot of it ends up eaten by wildlife or in waterways so not very visible.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›