this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
817 points (97.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

3483 readers
826 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

I remember listening to a discussion about how the advent of farming enabled the feeding (at least to a survivable level) of large groups of those loyal to the holder. This enabled militaries, which enabled military expansion, which snowballed into everything else. Refusing the farming means refusing a military, which leaves you defenseless against those who use it. Farming is a weapon.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 3 points 1 hour ago

But how will I pay my property taxes?

[–] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

But also dogs that sleep inside.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 hours ago

Not a primitivist, but low key

I love this meme. James C Scott approves.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Bold of you to assume hunter gatherers didn’t ferment alcohol out of naturally growing plants.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

...aaand hangovers!

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 29 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

The hunter gatherer lifestyle works nicely until you get injured, have teeth problems, get sick, or get pregnant. It also helps to be male and both physically and mentally able, so if you aren't good luck with that.

As someone who's had wisdom teeth issues I'm quite happy to have modern medicine rather than being in the stone age and just having to deal with a broken tooth section rubbing against a nerve...

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Dental health of hunter gathers looks like it was much better than ours:

"Hunter-gatherers had really good teeth," says Alan Cooper, director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA. "[But] as soon as you get to farming populations, you see this massive change. Huge amounts of gum disease. And cavities start cropping up."

Additionally, they had better spacing due to eating tougher foods like high fiber items and tendons. So there's less dental impacting like we have with wisdom teeth.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Survivalship bias at it's finest. In literal sence of the word

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 19 hours ago

Yeah things didn't really get better until Modern Dentistry so it took several thousand years to get better than hunter-gatherer level

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I went to eating like the great plains American first people about 2 years ago and haven't brushed my teeth since

About three months ago I had a dentist clean the plaques off my teeth and check them, to ensure I wasn't too misguided and my teeth had no new damage

The ancient people with great teeth also had bigger heads and bigger jaws. They could fit wisdom teeth

[–] nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

what does that look like? what's a normal day's food look like for you?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago) (1 children)

Beef, since cattle are the main product of my region. The native Americans ate bison

For dental health the best is no carbohydrates, few acids

Human skeletons don't show dental damage until the rise of agriculture, especially bread

I note that allergies prevent me from adding vegetables - I can't be healthy if I eat tannins or oxalates, many others can tolerate both of those

[–] nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 minutes ago

interesting. do you cook it? how much do you eat on average?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

While true, they exist today, and have a life expectancy of like 30. So mostly they just die before their teeth decay.

https://medium.com/@kennamai/the-truth-of-hunter-gatherers-the-healthiest-but-lower-life-expectancy-why-5bb2f149e165

33% of children die by the age of 15.

There is of course merit to us having active lifestyles, controlling calorie intake, and balancing our diets, but that's in addition to the fact that we live almost 3x as long as we used to due to modern medicine, so we should continue to follow modern medicine, science, and nutrition.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Nothing in this article addressed tooth decay or dental formation issues.

Also from the article:

Hunter-gatherers who live until the age of 15 typically experience a lifespan of around 72 years. Among elderly hunter-gatherers, the incidence of diseases such as cancer and high blood pressure is very low. When recalculating the average lifespan excluding child mortality, the average lifespan for hunter-gatherers ranges from 68 to 78 years.

I also never said we shouldn't follow science or modern medicine.

[–] Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, I've had enough medical issues that I'm grateful for modern medicine too. That being said, it could be conceivable to move to more of a hunter-gatherer model of living with modern necessities. It would certainly be interesting to see what that might look like on a societal scale.

[–] celeste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

Actually patriarchy only came with settling down. They actually had gender equality, which is pretty cool!

[–] will_a113@lemm.ee 49 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I know this is mostly a joke, but for anyone interested in this sort of thing I highly recommend you check out The Dawn of Everything, which goes into exhaustive detail about how in some places cities existed before agriculture, and in others agriculture existed for a long while without cities. (And by “check out” I mean prepare to devote long nights to reading with a million Wikipedia tabs open)

Just grabbed it from Anna's to put on my ereader thanks

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I read through the summary, and it sounds a lot like how evolutionary development is perceived by the layperson vs. how complex it really is, including the deception that we are at some high point. So the next question in my mind, and based on the summary the authors left to explore as the answer is probably a difficult one to find - are there paths that could have been traveled which didn't lead to similar messes like we find ourselves in? One assumption is always that capitalism and consumption and all that comes with them is inevitable. Maybe not? It would ruin this meme that I found very fitting for society, but that's again based on an inevitable conclusion to be true.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 16 hours ago

The ancient Greeks remembered their hunter gatherer tribal ancestors as living in a golden age, when everyone was equal and the gods walked among men

[–] will_a113@lemm.ee 9 points 23 hours ago

The premise is that humanity has had 10,000+ years to experiment with different ways of living on all corners of the Earth, so it’s ridiculous to say that the modern system that we’ve evolved with division of labor and accumulated wealth is the only possible way (or the inevitable way) - which was kinda the premise of Sapiens. And then they back it up with a ton of modern archaeological evidence. It’s a little dry and admittedly academic, but really compelling once you dig into it.

[–] hopeleft@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow thanks for a read for next weekend

[–] will_a113@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I appreciate your optimism - good luck!

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Great book. Debt is also a good one by Graeber

[–] Tupper@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

Came to share the same text. It adds a needed level of complexity to this joke and has some incredibly eye opening connections between historical events. The world would be a better place if everyone read this book

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But I like my tech. I just wish it didn't spy on me, and that we had better batteries for solar so that I can use my stuff guilt-free

[–] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It's possible to have great tech without the spying, but it takes a lot of understanding of and ability with computer technology

We have pretty good batteries. I have modelled solar on my house (based on records of the 2011 solar array I have), with 15kW of solar panels and many loads (especially HVAC, water heating, car charging) being done in daylight hours I would only need about 10kWh of battery, but 30kWh would be better for a bit of really bad weather tolerance

The main job of a battery is to provide power between dusk and dawn and to buffer power spikes (like air con starting up) from the solar power, and batteries are well up to doing that

For reference my normal night time power usage is 6kWh in winter, less when the days are longer

Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries are safe and aren't degraded by being charged and discharged daily. Near future battery technologies are less high performing, but are non polluting

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago

Yeah, we can have tech without single use plastics, car dependency, and neo-feudalism (late stage capitalism)

[–] Buttermilk@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Right tech is rad, just sucks that absolute grosses of people get to decide how all of it works and what it's used for.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think there is a country that doesn't spy on their citizens.

[–] Buttermilk@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

a country

Well there's your problem.

[–] Famko@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be the state rather than the country? Or is that synonymous?

[–] Buttermilk@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I guess I figured you can't really have the lines in the sand without a state making them mean something.

So yeah the distinction is worth making, and stateless is the end goal, but I reached for the bit 😁

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

On the bright side: the internets, videogames, plumbing and hot baths

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 15 hours ago

Touching a control for enough heat to cook dinner versus setting a fire

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 3 points 23 hours ago

Mod approved