this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
334 points (98.0% liked)

News

27164 readers
4671 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would "prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being."

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines "non-human" behavior as "any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species," with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 41 minutes ago

So a furry suit made from human hair is ok? Asking for a friend

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Besides them being stupid as hell to conduct this ridiculous culture war, I take issue with another thing, the name:

Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education

It's not unlawful until you forbid it. So the title makes no sense. You're not forbidding the unlawful. You're forbidding the previously lawful, making it unlawful.

Stupid assholes.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 18 minutes ago

Plus the acronym rules are inconsistent. It should be FURRE or FURRORIE

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

I admit that I block the furry and all its sexual representation on fedi when I see it. It doesn't turn me on that much and feels weird. But that's the same feeling a woman or man would have towards a gay person of the same sex or similar of different gender. This is sexism at its core. WTF!

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 1 points 29 minutes ago

Oh boy, the fascists have really done it now: they're going after the beastpeople! Beware its poisonous spittle!

[–] MiniMoose4Free@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda like this one I know the litter shit is bullshit. Though we all knew those annoying ass kids in school.

[–] jnb@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 hour ago

These idiot boomers fell for the facebook propaganda.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litter_boxes_in_schools_hoax

[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I bark at them using my very human vocal cords (I don't even have any other). Prove me on court that I was not using human vocal cords to bark. Or maybe I was using totally non-human made recording-speaker device?

Or maybe my 1.7m tall fursuit was designed to be weared by my cat? No way even lololong house cat could be that big. (lie, I don't own a fursuit, in any size, but point still apply).

Oh I know! Some tailed buttplugs were totally designed for pets and it is all about being pet care!

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 33 minutes ago

tailed buttplugs

The whole comment aside, just for those unaware, if you see someone with a tail in public, or just anywhere outside of sex-centered environment, it's almost surely a belt.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

tailed buttplugs were totally designed for pets

Now o want to see them try to debate this

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 17 points 4 hours ago

My barking at people is protected under the first amendment.

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

Can we start torso-kicking these people? Why do we have to be civil?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder how much of this is borne out of the hysteria over kids supposedly using litter boxes.

I had some gomer on the Denver Post forums that kept insisting it was not only a thing, but an epidemic. I kept asking him for the supposed evidence of this claim, all he could say was that he "talks to lots and lots of parents and teachers" and "the media won't report on it".

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

It's trivial to verify. Slap 20 bucks on the table and say "20 bucks you can't list a location with a litterbox for furries"

“talks to lots and lots of parents and teachers” and “the media won’t report on it”.

Ain't gonna get you 20 bucks. Need a location. If you get a location, call 'em. They'll confirm or deny. (They're gonna deny)

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 28 points 13 hours ago

Filing this under “Closeted conservative so ashamed of their kink that, instead of discussing their feelings with a therapist, psychiatrist, or even a trusted friend, believe everyone must share their taboo thoughts and therefore be preëmptively punished to stamp out the contagion since the only honorable alternative is undergoing apoptosis like some malfunctioning cell”.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 40 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

I'm not quite sure what it is exactly (/s), but maybe—just maybe—this is yet another attempt to fuck over and ostracize transfem and autistic people, but instead of being direct about it, using furries as the boogeyman.

[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 3 points 55 minutes ago

There are very many normal human sounds that are not speech, including, but not limited to: laughter, crying, yelling/screaming/yelping (in surprise, pain, fear), groaning, moaning, yawning, sneezing, coughing, vomiting, singing, whistling.

What constitutes human speech? There are languages that have sounds that don't exist in other languages (said as someone still trying to get a hold on rolling my Rs).

In any case, we should all learn some sign language. Seriously, it's useful to be able to communicate silently or just visually (e.g. Across a noisy room), plus it makes life way more inclusive for Deaf people.

For once Im halfheartedly glad it's not related to transgender. Still shitty nonetheless,

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago

Also to arrest basically any kindergartner.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 35 points 14 hours ago

Imposing this bullshit on children who often have vivid imaginations and like to play make believe shows just how much the Republican party actually cares about children.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 213 points 19 hours ago (26 children)

Man they are still caught up on that fake story somebody sent to one of these morons claiming kids were using litter boxes in school. It never happened but they're going to try to legislate it away anyway.

The lesson here is don't troll these idiots, they'll fucking believe it and then start passing idiotic laws for non-problems.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

These are the same sort of dumbfucks that absolutely believed the "LSD stickers/tattoos" bullshit way, way back and would insist on schools passing out flyers based on that stupid urban legend.

I remember being in sixth grade when they had a bout of that going around our school, and I was like, wait, what? And I had a lot of doubts. And that's when I was in sixth grade. Years later, you could look it up and see what nonsense it was. Anyway, I was at TWO different jobs where someone was trying to "inform parents" with some printouts they had about you guessed it, the bullshit LSD stickers nonsense. The first time, I told them "you know, this is urban legend, right?" I get immediately treated like I'm some kind of criminal that does not want to protect the children.

I suspect the bullshit around litter boxes will have a similar lifetime among those that are hard of thinking.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago

The lesson here is don't troll these idiots, they'll fucking believe it and then start passing idiotic laws for non-problems.

Throwback to when 4chan started memeing about pizzas, and the resulting chain of events led to a real pizza parlor being shot up by a right-wing nut job who thought it was full of pedophiles.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The weird thing is for some reason people will lie to perpetuate these falsehoods

Like I do therapy and I talk to teenagers regularly because teenagers need mental health support, obviously. And sometimes they’ll bring up shit like this: “my school installed a litter box because of these woke kids”

But even the most basic of prodding: “did they really” with a tone of like “come on” and they’ll backpedal, “well no, but like there are kids that have fursonas and shit”

It’s crazy to see it start so young. They’re realizing at like 16 they can get adults to gang up on the kid they think is weird by being dishonest, and adults buy into it because it’s a chance to bully someone weaker and politicians jump on it because it’s a new wedge issue to distract people from class consciousness

And what’s crazy is that by some perspectives if I call them out on this dishonesty and point out this cycle I’m indoctrinating them

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 63 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

And when you try and tell anyone who bought it they say there is evidence, while never being able to provide any.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] dontbelasagne@lemmy.world 34 points 15 hours ago

So they're scared of people becoming furries. I know a few furries, not in the scene myself but furries are genuinely some of the nicest people I know. And also this bill seems ableist because I knew an autistic person that would growl whenever he had a meltdown. He wasn't a furry, it was just how he was wired.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 53 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Texans, next time you look at the prices in the grocery store, remember that this is what your representatives are spending their time on.

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Or, you know, when your kids are dying of measles.

[–] valek879@sh.itjust.works 9 points 12 hours ago

Or when your kids are dying from school shooters...

[–] Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

Good luck trying to enforce that. Most people lick a small wound on their hands an fingers. It's our subconscious that triggers that.

[–] Bilaketari@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Licking a wound isn't grooming or maintenance though.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

It's maintenance.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 27 points 15 hours ago

Priorities.

[–] formulaBonk@lemm.ee 30 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I can’t wait for all IT infrastructure in Texas to get compromised over this. The amount of excellent it and comp sci guys that are furries is staggering. And there are a few online collectives that can and will do damage to personal and government entities over shit like this

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 10 hours ago

The amount of excellent it and comp sci guys that are furries is staggering.

Computers don't judge. And you can be anything you want behind a screen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] regrub@lemmy.world 84 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

They're going after easy targets like schools because if they targeted furries in the state government, all of the IT infrastructure would crumble.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 59 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Play Duck Duck Goose? Jail

Face paint? Beleive it or not Jail

Old McDonald? Straight to jail

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Can we still say "what's up, dawg?"

It is funny that the litter box story was taken as gospel.

What a time to be alive.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 58 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It’s incredible that republicans can constantly waste tax dollars on worthless shit like this and still be viewed as the party of financial responsibility by their dumb ass voting base

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 38 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Wow.

I remember learning about dinosaurs as an elementary schooler after Jurassic Park came out, and spending a few months on the playground pretending to be a velociraptor (well technically they're closer to deinonychous but w/e) ... apparently that is now banned, because otherwise I might have become a scaly, for life?

Wonderful.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›