this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
109 points (98.2% liked)

Selfhosted

44212 readers
377 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I commented this in another thread, but thought that it could do with its own post.

It's a solid list to go off of if you want to pick a few to host. The link has more info on each, as well as which ones are non-profit / for-profit

Overview

Have some space computing power and want to donate it to a good cause? How about 10+ good causes at once?

♻️ put an under-utilized system to good use
🚲 use as much or as little CPU/RAM/DISK as you want
✨ 100% more soul warming than mining
📈 geek out over your CPU/disk/bandwidth stats on the leaderboards

This is a collection of containers that all contribute to public-good projects:

  • networks: Tor, i2p
  • computing: boinc, foldingathome
  • archiving: archivewarrior, zimfarm, kiwix, archivebox, pywb
  • storage: ipfs, storj, sia, transmission

This v1 list was started by the ArchiveBox project, but it's open to contributions.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 16 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Be careful with compute intensive tasks. Some providers don't like when you actually utilize your rented hosts.

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 19 points 11 hours ago

Not a problem when self-hosting on own hardware. Especially in winter. Overly complicated spaceheater goes brrrr

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

What would they do about it?

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago

There are often some "fair use" paragraphs in their respective ToS that they could enforce and either terminate your account or request you to uprade to a higher tier product. Usually (not always) VPSs are overprovisioned, so when people start to fully utilize their rented machines theit whole business model goes belly-up.

[–] BennyInc@feddit.org 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Find some loophole in their T&C to terminate your account I guess. Similar to how mobile providers don’t like people actually using a lot of bandwidth on their „unlimited“ plans.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Never heard of this so far but maybe. Would be interesting to try

[–] Thorry84 6 points 9 hours ago

Many providers have specific clauses for this. Ever since crypto mining became a thing providers have included in general terms you can't over use the service. And often specifically against using it for crypto mining.

Providers will normally warn users and only kick them off when no explanation is forthcoming.

Usually this applies to shared services, like a VPS. You pay a lower price because you share hardware. But that only works if the hardware is shared fairly. If another user hogs all the resources, the service is no good for anyone. But it can also apply to seemingly dedicated services, like your own server for example. In that case the server is free to be used for whatever, but things like cooling and power are still shared. A regular dedicated server service will be based on typical use and can kick users out who require too much cooling or power. In cases where the resources are legitimately required, they will offer contracts that allow you to use all of the resources all of the time. But in turn you will have to pay a premium for something like that.

On the surface it may seem like a bit of bullshit, but that's often what allows prices to be as low as they are. So I'm fine with it, as long as it's made clear beforehand (which in my experience it is)

[–] FatsoJackson@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Love the art.

[–] Selfhoster1728@infosec.pub 6 points 12 hours ago

Made me learn about Archiveteam, thanks :D

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

I like this, thank you; saving to process further in the coming days...