this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
874 points (97.7% liked)

politics

20563 readers
4060 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] knightmare1147@lemmy.world 4 points 11 minutes ago

Give me AOC or Bernie.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 1 points 5 minutes ago

I'd vote for him but he'd need to ignore the consultants next time if he wants any hope of winning.

[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 16 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Personally, I'm hoping Zelensky will run for US president after strong Dien in Ukraine. You might be thinking that someone from another country can't be president. Well.... looks at current situation in White House At least this one would be elected.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 56 minutes ago

I think we need to go with the Zelensky model (comedian-turned-politician) rather than Zelensky proper. My money's on Jon Stewart and/or Bill Burr.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Walz is likable and has that working class appeal, but his debate performance wasn't great. I'd vote for him, but I don't think he'll make it through the primaries. I'd much rather have Pete Buttigieg personally.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

I guess I’m the only one against this idea. I’m not keen on candidates that have already lost running again. Get someone else up there to try.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

I'm nervous to hear this already. I want him to be pushed into it, not to want it so much.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 59 minutes ago

Please do it

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Hopefully this time they don't muzzle him. Tim's a great example of dem policies working,

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

We know that female candidates with male VP's named Tim don't win against Republicans. Hillary and Kamala proved that. But this is wholly different, so its possible, concievable...

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago

female candidates with male VP’s named Tim

Man, I had to look up who Hillary's veep candidate was. Feels like that election was about 60 years ago.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Would have wanted him as president nominee either way, hope he gets it. The name Tim Walz is a name that needs to go down in history with the title "saviour of the US" or smth like that

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

He can't save us any more than Obama could.

He might be better than Obama (might) but we have to save ourselves.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

That's a lot of pressure to put on one man...

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

"Run for president in 2028" XD That ship has sailed. I don't think they will have any more elections.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

Even North Korea has elections. They might not be fair but they will be held.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

Oh yes, please, older people, maybe I'll have my late great grandma run a campaign for the democrats from her grave.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

Walz will be a perfectly normal age to run for president.

[–] SippyCup 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

No sooner than he mentions that he might run to the right wing attacks on his age begin.

I'd like someone younger too but let's take the candidates we can eh? Dude's compassionate and far left for a dam at the moment.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

And I'm sure he'll choose a young running mate (AOC maybe? Though I'd hate to see her leave Congress for such a powerless position).

[–] edg@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago) (1 children)

The candidates we can? Surely Democrats can find a single candidate that is under 50.

[–] SippyCup 1 points 22 minutes ago

You can find them further left than him too.

Walz is already popular. Unify now, spend the next four years opposing Trump and building support around someone who can sweep the election.

Kinda like Trump did to Obama and Biden.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 hour ago

wha? I thought it was known that walz was actually pretty young (60) compared to how he looks lol. Definitely on the older side of average age for president looking at the stats, but he's 2 years younger than jon stewart and even gavin newsom is 57.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

Age isnt always an indicator on how people are mentally, and if they are a backwards prick

load more comments
view more: next ›