this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
116 points (97.5% liked)

World News

41221 readers
2707 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Perpetrators of “revenge porn” offences are being allowed to keep explicit images of their victims on their devices, after a failure by prosecutors to obtain orders requiring their deletion.

An Observer analysis of court records in intimate image abuse cases has found that orders for the offenders to give up their devices and delete photos and videos are rarely being made. Of 98 cases concluded in the magistrates courts in England and Wales in the past six months, just three resulted in a deprivation order.

In other cases involving digital devices, such as offences regarding indecent images of children, these orders were made consistently.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) this weekend said more must be done to “stop ­perpetrators retaining these images and continuing to take gratification from their crimes”.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously always issuing deletion orders would be a good thing, but it doesn't seem like it would be very effective. It would be all too easy for the offender to stash a backup flash drive somewhere before "complying" with the order.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago

Also, while it seems such an order is legal - should it be?

If these were legally obtained photos, why should someone be compelled to delete them? Compelled deletion is a slippery slope. Shared a legally purchased mp3 with a friend? Delete it. Shared a picture of Beyonce at the Superbowl? Delete it.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 27 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

There’s a cool YouTube channel called “Will it Blend,” and I think that dude should get those phones.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, they’re still blending things‽

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Nah it’s been 4 years. But they could do a comeback special.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is he a fan of revenge porn?

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Simple math is a challenge for you?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I’m actually pretty good at math, thanks for asking.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes that math checks out what’s your point?