this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
364 points (96.4% liked)

memes

12042 readers
2475 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HKPiax@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wait, that's the graphical interpretation of the Fourier transform?

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One possible way to show it. Makes sense to me

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I’ve no idea what it is, so from my understanding it’s:

Changing the angle a wave is viewed from?

If that is the case, do waves have width?

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I think the idea is that you can eventually get an approximation of whatever wave-like curve you want by merging several pure sin/cos functions with varying amplitudes, wavelengths, and offsets

Fun fact: this is mostly how JPEG works - it uses fourier transforms to approximate an image in a way that takes up much less storage than storing information about each pixel.

[–] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's not supposed to represent waves at different angles.

Rather it represent an axis (the one on the right) for each frequency of waves that is contained in the signal (on the left)

Here the signal is made up of two different frequency waves and the graph on the right is there to show the value of thoses two and their respective magnitudes.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The axis going up is amplitude, the one going right and down is time, and the new axis rightward and upward (left to right on the right-hand chart) is frequency.

The left chart doesn't show the frequency axis. The right one doesn't show time.

The wave shown on the left in the dark cyan color is (shown to be) composed of two different waves of two frequencies shown on the left in gray and in the space between charts as dark cyan. The higher frequency one is lower amplitude.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's a 90° angle for a reason.

Changing to some random angle may have sense for some theory, but it's not the Furrier transformation.

And no, the waves have 0 width. The widths on the drawing are for illustration purposes.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 21 hours ago

And like the original he's also taking drugs (although Adolf didn't have Ketamine).

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Never pull a Reverse Vin Braun.