this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
41 points (86.0% liked)

Linux

6111 readers
316 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] runeko@programming.dev 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't neeeeeed a homelab with 24 cores and 96 Gb ram sitting next to my desk either, but here we are.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just built a desktop with 64gb of RAM. I could get by on 16 easily. Should I seek treatment?

[–] runeko@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

Nah, install a terminal multiplexer instead.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’s quite the URL. Is it named after one of Elon’s kids?

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

As the other person said, domains beginning with xn-- are non-ASCII domains in Punycode.
The real domain is: マリウス.com

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Today I learned!

[–] yuri@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

punycode domains fucking rule! registrars ignore the shortening, so you can get a single character domain like ツ.gay for a pittance. there’s some non-english TLDs that resolve through punycode as well. generally they’ll have some SOLID english words that haven’t yet been taken, like butts.移动

i own both of those by the way. ツ.gay will take you to the new onehundredninetysix community, and butts.移动 goes to my favorite youtube video!

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

https://butts.移动

I'm so happy it's not Rick Astley's song. I 100% expected you to fool us.

[–] sjmulder@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 week ago

It’s how non-Latin Unicode domain names are encoded, in this case one made out of Japanese characters. I suppose it depends on the browser whether or not it shows them.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You do need it.

If your anything like me you end up with 200 terminal windows open on your desktop.

With a Terminal multiplexer you can attach to named sessions from any terminal open and get the correct context for long running things you care about

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

200?! I can pretty confidently say approximately nobody is anything like you 😄

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 1 week ago
for nop in $(seq 1 200); do
    open -a Terminal --new &
    sleep 0.1
done

One of us, one of us

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Annoyingly long post totally misses the point of using tmux and chalks it up to "elitism". So who's really acting like an elitist contrarian??

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's sarcasm. They posted an update.

I got whooshed then. Maybe because I only skimmed the article to try to figure out what their point was.

[–] Overspark 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty much agree with most of his post. Terminal multiplexers are useless on your desktop, but great on servers you ssh to.

Wild ideas aside, zellij is really nice as just a terminal multiplexer though 😅

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you not SSH onto your desktop? I do it all the time. I often want to switch from coding at my desk to coding on a laptop, and tmux + SSH makes that transition completely seamless.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you use any IDE with that flow?

Basically just tmux + Helix + fish shell.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago
[–] Overspark 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, my desktop is for gaming 😄 Also I do most of my coding on a server I ssh to anyway.

[–] mrkite@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you admit it's not useless on the desktop of you actually code locally.

[–] Overspark 1 points 1 week ago

If you switch between doing it locally and accessing your machine remotely it makes sense. But if you stay entirely locally then your DE or compositor is probably way more powerful and easier to use than a multiplexer. Unless you stay entirely in text mode and don't even have a GUI, then it starts to make sense again I guess.

[–] FireplaceSteward@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I 100% get his point, I only use it on my pc because I also use it on my server which I ssh into and I’ve got a lot of muscle memory there. I also sometimes ssh into my pc from other pcs (and even the server too confusingly) so I like to have tmux there for that too. Though I don’t mess with it, I don’t play with themes or configs really, and I’m certainly not interested in controlling Spotify from my tmux setup.

[–] pancake@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago

That's a really nice read. My own excuse for using tmux is that I want other people to be able to use my computer if they ever need to, so instead of installing a tiling WM I use a solution that only adds keyboard-centric navigation to the tools that I use.