this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
509 points (98.8% liked)

Today I Learned

21484 readers
439 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 104 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why isn’t something like this covered under human trafficking?

[–] neptune@dmv.social 68 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The free market has to be free /s

[–] sci 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

from what i read in the article comments, the human trafficking law only covers trafficking across state borders

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

In the US the federal government has very little power to regulate individual's actions that power is typically reserved for the states. The federal government deals with international and interstate matters.

So the federal government can make laws against selling people across state borders but they can not make laws against selling people within state borders. Because that power belongs to the states.

Yeah we know that's why we dominate a lot of the headlines

[–] foksmash@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It also means that they didn't have a need for such a law until 2009.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or it just didn't make the news

[–] foksmash@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's obviously the most logical reason. For decades, no, centuries there have been legions of parents selling their children in the hotspot of Mississippi. These outlaws found the loophole and it was only stopped because of a 2009 law! Fucking braindead.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Or it happened but not to that degree. It doesn't have either or lmao

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, because if MISSISSIPPI doesn't have a law specifically forbidding something, it's always just because it doesn't happen.

In related news, the past didn't happen.

[–] foksmash@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jeez, the fear mongering really works on you eh?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

It's called knowing the first thing about the history and present day of the worst state in the Union.

Fear mongering is what GOP politicians from Mississippi and other deep red states use to retain absolute power in spite of having done a consistently piss poor job for over half a century.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

So are there any other states without child selling laws? Asking for a friend.

[–] fapforce5@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't Mississippi still one of the few states with an unenforceable (and symbolic) pro-slavery law on the books too?

They're a special kind of asshole in that state.

[–] brawleryukon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They're a special kind of asshole in that state.

Cue Phil Ochs' take on the state...

[–] Cjwii@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I'll always uplemm a Phil ochs video!

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Great song! If you combine this, Mississippi Goddam and the movie Idiocracy, you have an almost exact picture of Mississippi today.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Actually pretty sure that penal slavery is still the law of the land in all or almost all of the states.

Wouldn't put it past Mississippi to officially endorse the much worse and extremely illegal chattel slavery, though. It's just something they'd do.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lots of states have unenforceable laws still on the books for reasons of symbolism, particularly with regard to sodomy and gay people.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah I know. A lot of "we want to be hyper-authoritarian bigots but the constitution won't let us! We're still gonna officially brag about how awful we are, though" state proclamations going around, have been basically forever.

Still doesn't mean that Mississippi isn't the worst hellhole of them.

[–] Kinglink@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

I take that more as a good sign. We should have limited laws rather than a law for everything possible someone can do wrong.

Then again the fact should be seen as a condemnation of that woman. Don't be the reason a new law is made.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

What kind of car?

My kid is acting up.

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Im not sure if its a good thing its so rare or bad that there wasn't a law against it.