this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
978 points (97.8% liked)

politics

20415 readers
3075 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 153 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sounds like the GOP wants 14 year old girls trending bar and getting hit on all night

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 144 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Then when they're 15, they can rape them, but marry them when they get pregnant (because plenty of conservatives support that), they won't be able to abort their rapists child, and with a bit of luck the GOP will also make divorce harder (that's also something they want) so that their young wives will never be able to escape them and because conservatives will ensure marital rape continues to go unpunished.

[–] MercuryUprising@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago

It's honestly right in everyone's face and yet mentioning it people will act like it's some sort of fringe conspiracy. No, motherfucker. It's their policy. They're open about it and they leave a paper trail.

[–] hglman@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 33 points 2 years ago

Obviously. Also children are generally more easily exploitable.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 82 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Where's the author been the last 6 years? The only time the GOP surprises me is when they do something that benefits people more than corporations.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago (50 children)

You shouldn't have a job at the age of 14, let alone have one in a bar. I'm not sure who's worse- the self serving gop or parents that would allow their kids to work in that environment

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You have to remember that the people promoting this sort of thing never in a million years think it would affect themselves or their loved ones. They are 100% convinced it will be used to "punish" people, just not themselves.

You see it literally every time republicans implement things like abortion bans, detainment camps, child labor etc. And republicans start crying in the media and say stupid shit like "He's not hurting the right ones"....

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago

Look I started working before I was 14 and I turned out perfectly dysfunctional!

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 73 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Conservatives have found yet another way to groom teenagers. "Oh, it's fine. She's used to it. She works here. Hey, you like what you see? Let me sneak you a shot..."

For conservatives, every accusation is a confession.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I started working construction when I was 15. I'm in my 30s and my body is broken, but like, I gotta eat right? Obviously this 14 yr old shouldn't be working at a bar, and this is a symptom of a larger problem, but that's SoCiAlIsM.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Except socialism is not directing your politics, capitalism is. When you have a lot of money lobbying politicians, corruption is inevitable. It even tells you in the article.

The bills are backed by restaurant lobbying groups as part of a broader effort to loosen child labor laws “to cut labor costs and deregulate employment”, the report writes – at a time when child labor violations are on the rise across the country.

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

I think we are in agreement then. My socialism bit is just how the people around me see any type of regulation, regardless of their own interests.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because they can pay kids less than minimum wage.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've never heard of this before, but I looked it up and it's sort of true in Wisconsin:

From https://dwd.wisconsin.gov/er/laborstandards/workpermit/minoremployment.htm:

Minimum Wage for minors is $7.25 per hour. Employers may pay an "Opportunity Wage" of $5.90 per hour for the first 90 days of employment. On the 91st day, the wage must increase to $7.25 per hour

So yeah, for 90 days they can get away with paying less than minimum wage. For tipped jobs, the minimum wage is $2.33, and the "opportunity" tipped minimum wage is 2.13.

Everything about this is back-asswards.

[–] AssPennies@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That 90 days isn't just random either. It happens to be the length of summer vacation for most kids here in the US. Perfect for exploiting them on their summer break!

Gonna go to camp this summer little Johnny and Jane? Fuck no you're not, off to the factory with you, and here's your six dollars (that's like a dollar an hour!).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sudo@lemmy.today 19 points 2 years ago

How much do you want to bet kids generally make less tips than adults too, because 'what do they need my money for they are just a kid. Not like they need to pay rent'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So the GOP finally became the comic book villain it always wanted to become. Congratulations.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Finally? Where have you been since Nixon?

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I kinda zoned out that season and went on watching Thatcher: Rise of the Witch.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] athos77@kbin.social 42 points 2 years ago (5 children)

[The owner of a tavern] disputes the idea that teens could be put at special risk of sexual assault by serving alcohol. “The environment isn’t the crime … the person who sexually assaults a person has committed the crime,”

I see they've fully bought in to the Republican talking points theory of "guns don't kill people, people kill people".

[–] alnilam@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And they conveniently forget the follow up: "people with guns kill more people than people without guns"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] justhach@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (16 children)

America, what is you doing? Get your legal drining age to a reasonable age first FFS.

A 14 year old can serve alcohol for seven years before they're legally allowed to drink any? Thats fucked.

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's your issue? Not that 14 year olds shouldn't be working in bars, where hours interfere with school and growing brains properly, and pervs get pervier as they get drunker? Not that child labour is bad?

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Can I not be upset at both? Not sure how what I said seemed like an approval of 14yo working in bars, but go off.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

Can go kill people over seas 3 years beforehand too. Our priorities are so fucked.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 34 points 2 years ago

The children yearn for the wines.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Someone told me the other day that the US/Canada and Europe should become one federal entity and that this would benefit everyone living in it. My response was that having america be the largest economic entity in that block imposing the "american values" of restoring child labour, lack of healthcare, removing abortion and the complete and total eradication of worker protections on Europeans absolutely would not benefit us. Maybe if america had a left to speak of things would change.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kgbbot@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago

Maybe he can't find employees because either it sucks to work there or he's not paying enough...both solvable with corrupting 14 year olds.

[–] beanz00_@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

as i have said before, republicans seem to just oppose anything the democrats are for out of spite or something, its beyond a deranged level of stupidity

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Honestly, there are a few jobs that make sense for teenagers to get some spending money, and that's fine: things like cashiering a grocery store or sports game. With our enforced 21 year drinking limit and most places having open container laws we stigmatize alcohol more than I would like, including this. It's not like a teenager hasn't seen beer before.

HOWEVER, part of our strict laws include penalizing employees personally if they serve someone underage. So are we going to exempt these minors from those penalties? I suspect not...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Jeff Baker, the owner, says he “could use one more bartender, and probably two more cooks”. He hasn’t found takers in over a year of running “help wanted” ads, so he’s made do by working extra shifts in the kitchen and paring back the menu.

He had to accept his own shitty offer. Beautiful

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At first I read it as "serving alcohol to 14 years old". It seemed a bit unusual for the states but why not, legal age to drink beer or wine is already 16 in a lot of country.

Then I realized what the headline really was ! WHAT THE FUCK is wrong with the US ? It looks like they competing to see how quickly they can revert to middle age.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›