this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
880 points (86.7% liked)

Political Memes

7972 readers
1782 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he never said it's acceptable

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He did. He wants Ukraine to accept that Russia has stolen their land and people. If it wasn't acceptable then he would want them to fight back.

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you're mischaracterizing and making leaps of logic.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

West is willing to accept Russia's demand for parts of Ukraine. That would be a requirement to stop the war. Unless you think West thinks Putin will give back what he has stolen?

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what is his position? He doesn't support Ukraine defending itself. What does he support? He has stated he supports a negotiated end to the war. Negotiated. What do you think that means? It can ONLY mean Ukraine negotiates how much land Putin is allowed to steal.

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he could mean total withdrawal and reparations. you are making leaps of logic.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok you're trolling me. Or do you believe in any situation where Russia is not defeated yet agrees to total withdrawal and reparations?

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you believe in any situation where Russia is not defeated yet agrees to total withdrawal and reparations?

anything is possible if cornel west is elected

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

West shares Trumps view of Putin and would allow to re-arm and attack again. Both are opposed to NATO which would lead to a US exit of NATO and a large proliferation of nuclear weapons as countries can no longer rely on the US nuclear safety net and would have to build their own. The only reason we have so few nations without nuclear weapons is the existence of NATO. West/Trump are a threat to humanity.

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both are opposed to NATO

for different reasons. I oppose NATO, too.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whats the alternative to a group agreement of protection and limit to nukes like NATO provides?

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Abolition of the idea of sovereign countries?

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then just abolish violence. Just as easy.

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the existence of the state doesn't abolish violence, so why should that be the standard?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wishing for all states to just stop existing is just as likely as wishing for all violence to be abolished. Why waste a wish?

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i'm not wishing. i'm organizing.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are organizing to convince nations like the US and China and Russia to just stop existing? Just convince people to get along and to stop being corrupt. Nations are fine if people get along.

I'm organizing locally to build power outside of the state.

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

West shares Trumps view of Putin and would allow to re-arm and attack again.

you have no evidence for this

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Evidence: Russia completed the theft of Crimea(while denying their active invasion of it) and immediately built up forces for another attack while denying it would ever attack Ukraine again all the while talking about how Ukraine isn't a real country. There is no evidence Russia will stop until it controls all of Ukraine as they have said they wanted to do many times.

West and Trump want to trust Putin...a verified(many times over) liar and willing to break agreements and treaties at any moment.

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

when did either of them say they trust putin? especially cornel west?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Negotiating for peace implies trust that the peace treaty will be followed...otherwise why negotiate the treaty?

[–] hoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Negotiating for peace implies trust

right. that doesn't mean that they have said they do trust him.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They haven't said it but they would HAVE to do it to negotiate as they said they want to do. Yet Putin has proven himself untrustworthy over and over.