this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
361 points (94.8% liked)

News

25333 readers
3934 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Freed Israeli hostages erupted in anger during a tense meeting on Tuesday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying that they were terrified they would be killed by Israeli airstrikes on Gaza instead of their Hamas captors.

"We were in tunnels, terrified that it would not be Hamas, but Israel, that would kill us, and then they would say Hamas killed you," the woman from the southern Israeli village of Nir Oz near the Gaza border said

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Do you have a good resource for that? All I can find are unsubstantiated claims and refutations of said claims. With the only thing that might hold any water being speculation that israeli police and hamas may have caught civilians in the crossfire but even that is pretty weak and I can't find anything other than "it probably happened because it almost always happens when police open fire".

https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/viral-post-seeks-to-change-festival-massacre-narrative/

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/nov/17/stew-peters/no-this-video-doesnt-show-israeli-military-killing/

The world is already full of enough misinformation. So how about we don't shit on the memory of murdered civilians and use them to build a narrative to benefit politicians?

[–] BMatthew@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is that during the Oct 7 massacre (aka "the Rave")? Or is that when they were being held hostage in Gaza?

Because I think even the IDF has acknowledged they probably murdered some hostages while they were indiscriminately bombing and ethnically cleansing the Palestinians. But what the previous poster implied was that the IDF were murdering people during the massacre... which reeks of "false flag operation" conspiracy theories.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here's the media basis report on the source:

  • Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, False Claims
  • Bias Rating: FAR LEFT
  • Factual Reporting: MIXED
  • Country: USA
  • Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
  • Media Type: Website
  • Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
  • MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-grayzone/

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

speculation that israeli police and hamas may have caught civilians in the crossfire

The releasee is quoted in the article linked as saying they were fired on by IDF helicopters after being taken hostage.

Obviously assigning motive is going to be speculation. Was the IDF deliberately killing hostages? Seems unlikely to me. Deliberately careless with the lives of hostages when trying to kill Palestinians? Based on the looser use of force rules we've seen from the IDF that seems perfectly possible.

how about we don’t shit on

shhhh come now. Don't feed the internet outrage machine. Better to keep a neutral tone so you don't shut down rational argument.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The IDF has a public policy not to allow hostage-taking and even killing the hostage if necessary. It’s controversial but not a new policy.

[–] brambledog@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The link you gave said this was a military policy used.on military, not civilians.

It also appears they stopped doing it a decade ago, according to your source.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you read the link there’s a controversy on whether they stopped at all. Many of the families of hostages and the released hostages have accused the Israeli government of trying to kill them.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah. I am not going to be "neutral" any time people are ignoring who actually murdered and raped civilians because attributing their deaths to someone else is more politically expedient. I do the same any time someeone DARES to talk about "crisis actors" with regard to the daily school shooting in the US.

I don't fucking care about "the internet outrage machine". I care about the people who suffered regardless of what side they are on. The very least we can do for the dead is to respect why they died. That includes who pulled the trigger and why.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so, you're calling out the IDF killing 10 Gazans for every Israeli death? or do those not count?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry. Are you incapable of doing two things at once?

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ok so you are, and not just coming with the copout of "but Hamas human shields so IDF absolved", now what about the farce that is acting as if this shit started in October of this year

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The very least we can do for the dead is to respect why they died. That includes who pulled the trigger and why.

"why" includes things such as the persecution of the Palestinian people by Israel. It also included (alleged) manipulation and empowerment of Hamas by Iran.

Here is an idea: try to read the posts you respond to. Rather than just immediately categorizing it into one of many straw men.

Bibi funds hamas

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The rape claim is false and unsubstantiated. A lie by the IDF. Just like the 40 beheaded babies

Zero evidence is available I have tried looking for it. Hamas did not rape anyone on Oct7.

They did kill non combatants. They did not rape anyone.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not going to be “neutral”

Apologies for the misunderstanding. Not neutral as not taking sides, neutral as in neutral tone. Calm, to the point and not full of anger and high emotion.

Moral outrage is a biological response to horror, but that warm feeling of righteous indignation does not help anyone. It makes anyone who might need to hear what you have to say instantly stop listening.