this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
697 points (97.7% liked)

Science Memes

12491 readers
1933 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The tragedy is that studies like this still get funding over actually relevant research.

[–] maeries@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Damn, all those like ... 10$ that could have been used somewhere else

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something tells me that you don't work in science. The process for getting science funding isn't simple and weeds out useless studies pretty quickly. On average, calls for proposals have about a 15% success rate. So, 15 in every 100 proposals get funded. They are funded after being vetted for usefulness, feasibility, novelty, cost, and other factors.

Since studies are well-vetted before getting funded, studies that sound like they're simple or useless based on headlines normally make a lot of sense when you read the research results.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Some of the odd studies were simply cheap, and are, in fact useless