this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
73 points (89.2% liked)

World News

46177 readers
3028 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Because militaries, or groups that act like militaries, can use terrorist activities to further their goals. They can be both.

When an organization is large, fixed in location, has ranks, news sources tend to call them militaries. Especially if it's associated with an government.

When organizations are smaller, cell-based, less identifiable, they tend to be referred to as terrorists

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

The term has become pretty loose with climate activists being called terrorists and whatnot. Anyways, for me the defining characteristic of terror is:

The goal to strike fear in the civilian population. The goal is not to achieve military advantages like securing areas or destroying strategic assets.

As such, small units can be non terrorists (guerilla warfare), while nations can engage in terror (Russia prioritizing civilian targets over military).

Always bad when a definition depends on intent though, especially in controversial topics.