this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
762 points (97.0% liked)

politics

25168 readers
2734 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veraxus@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Christianity has a core problem in that its holy texts can be interpreted in a myriad of ways.

Only if you completely ignore all context, as modern Christianity has done. With even a little historical and cultural knowledge, the context makes the vast majority of it quite clear. That clarity also stands in stark opposition to a vast swath of modern Christian dogma and teaching, so there is a vested interest to keep the context out of mainstream discussion.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

With even a little historical and cultural knowledge, the context makes the vast majority of it quite clear.

If that was at all true, there wouldn't be different sects and denominations, and indeed, Christianity as we know it likely wouldn't exist.

Christianity (and it's progenitor Judaism) is and always has been interpreted through the lens of culture, and it just so happens that we have at least two subcultures, religious progressives and conservatives, in the United States that insist their interpretation is the most true, correct, and faithful to the text. If I had a dollar for every time a Christian said, "But if you only read it with the proper context..."

What you find clear about the texts of the Bible through your own paradigm, unfortunately, doesn't agree with the hate preachers and the Revelation-thumpers, who instead choose to emphasize the vengeful Jesus who zealously overturned tables, whipped people, and will one day ride in on a cloud of fire and lightning to exact judgement and vengeance upon humanity.

Your Jesus of love and acceptance and their Jesus of blood and vengeance both exist in your Bible, and which you choose to follow seems to be a largely subjective matter. So again I reiterate: a core problem is the holy texts themselves.

I think it's admirable that you choose a more humanist path because of what you feel is self-apparent about your god and your religion. I just wish your brethren all felt the same way.

[–] Veraxus@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not especially religious. I was raised in that environment - the vengeful hellfire version, no less - and repeatedly found that it did not hold up to even a little scrutiny. And when I challenged the fact that the scripture I was being told to read outright condemned the behavior, teachings, and interpretations that were being foisted on me at home and on Sundays - it was not those vile teachings that were the problem... it was me.

I'm more an adherent of accuracy in all things, and I will call out things I know to be false. My loves how, around Christmas, I repeatedly remind them that Jesus was most likely born in Sept-Oct and that Christmas and all it's traditions are wildly pagan, and wish them all a Happy Yule.

But yeah, Jesus/Yeshua was a humanist. Even the flipping tables and whipping happened against people who were taking advantage of others. I can imagine him, Carl Sagan, and Siddhartha Gautama getting along famously.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

You're good people. I think we've successfully beat this subject to death. I hope you have a lovely week.