this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
499 points (96.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60266 readers
1415 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I suppose remote backup is the only option for something that destroys everything in the area, but raid is essential anyway.

[–] UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

makes sense, I was hoping for a cheaper answer. Buying land (caz renting a server is the same as cloud storage isn't it?) somewhere is probly expensive.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you know someone who lives somewhere else and also has a NAS, you can help each other by using each other for remote backup.

[–] UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

sadly I don't, now I need to talk this onto someone... I don't even know who'd be interested. But great idea, needs a lot of administrative work tho. And also leaving an open (pwd protected, but still an open port) connection to a storage server 24-7 does not sound very safe.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You could do a scheduled backup/sync every day/week, if you don't want the port open always.

[–] koper 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

raid is essential anyway

Why? If there are offsite backups that can be restored in an acceptable time frame, what's still the point of RAID?

[–] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

I'd say it depends on your circumstances and your tolerance to the possibility of data loss. The general answer to the question is that without using some kind of redundancy, either mirrored disks or RAID, the failure of a single disk would mean you lose your data. This is true for each copy of your data that you have.

[–] mwgreatest@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)