this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
1093 points (97.2% liked)
Political Memes
9144 readers
3169 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I understand that you think socialism is fundamentally flawed, I can tell from your tone. I am attempting to engage you politely despite your previous mischaracterizations of what I have said.
I would like to present some counterexamples. Countries like Norway, Sweden, and Denmark have implemented socialist policies such as universal healthcare, free education, and a strong social safety net, and they've seen significant economic growth and social progress as a result.
In addition, the cooperative movement in countries like Spain and Italy has shown that worker-owned cooperatives can be highly successful and provide better working conditions and benefits for employees. And let's not forget about the Nordic model of socialism, which combines elements of market economics with strong social welfare policies to create a more equitable society.
But even within my own country (US), we've seen that periods of prosperity have often coincided with the implementation of social safety nets like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and SNAP. These programs have helped to reduce poverty and inequality, and they've also contributed to economic growth by putting money in people's pockets and stimulating demand.
Furthermore, many of the worker protections we take for granted today were implemented after the Great Depression, as a response to the failures of laissez-faire capitalism and the exploitation of workers. The Fair Labor Standards Act, the National Labor Relations Act, and other key laws that safeguard workers' rights were all enacted during this period.
It seems to me that socialism is not inherently flawed but rather it has been distorted or watered down in some cases, or implemented in ways that don't prioritize the needs of working-class people.
It depends - “socialism” can mean more than one thing. Not all implementations are fundamentally flawed.
Sweden has a total population less than New York and is 90% Christian. Norway is the size of LA and Chicago combined. Denmark only slightly larger, and all have very homogeneous populations. It’s fantastic they’ve been able to support those socialist programs, but compared to the enormous size and demographic complexities of the US, it’s not a fair comparison.
If you want those programs in the US (and I do), you have a ridiculously difficult challenge ahead that simply will not be met by wishing it so, or believing we can all just demand it as one people and it will happen. Which are the two main methods of political change those who proclaim themselves “left” on here seem to propose.
Institutional, national change must have a national party. People must constantly engage with that national party to keep it going in the direction they want.
Socialists on Lemmy don’t have that. What they seem to have is a lot of hate for Democrats and no solutions.