this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
1175 points (99.2% liked)

Political Memes

9176 readers
3002 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BenevolentOne@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This doesn't appear to be true. The website still shows the full constitution. It's more likely someone has meddled with the archive.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this wasn't true, then why did the library of Congress have a banner on its site stating

The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience.

I'm not sure how you think someone "meddled" with the internet archive or what your source is but the smallest bit of research will bring you to reputable news outlets saying this happened.

I think you are missing the part where the library of Congress simply added the sections back when people noticed it was gone.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What the hell is a "data issue"

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They had an issue with the data. They didn't like it.

[–] danzabia@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] achille225@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I encourage you to read the comment right above yours; the website really altered the constitution.

[–] danzabia@infosec.pub -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It appears someone made a mistake and it's now remedied. However the speed with which it gets spun into full-blown constitutional crisis is what's frustrating, when a much simpler explanation fits.

There are enough travesties actually happening with this administration, we don't need to spin up fake ones.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, a mistake that just happened to remove the exact things that this administration does not like.

Don't be naive.

[–] danzabia@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm curious about the sequence of events you think this would initiate. Perhaps the ICE raids would finally be brought before a judge, invoking the writ of habeas corpus. If it turns out that the information is no longer on the government website, the judge might declare it irrelevant? Even if the removal was malicious and intentional, it's still just a stupid prank.

Getting people outraged about things like this simply distracts people from the actual corruption and self-dealing happening in this administration.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

It's not about actually changing the Constitution. This change doesn't do anything official, but it's not meaningless and it's clearly intentional.