this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
65 points (72.4% liked)

World News

49098 readers
1551 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Between 2010 and 2021, unilateral sanctions caused ~564,258 deaths each year – more than five times the number of people killed annually in direct armed combat. This warning comes from a new report published in The Lancet, which contextualizes decades of data on how sanctions affect mortality.

“From a rights-based perspective, evidence that sanctions lead to losses in lives should be sufficient reason to advocate for the suspension of their use,” the study’s authors argue. But that is far from reality. Over the same decade, nearly a quarter of all of the world’s countries were affected by sanctions, driven primarily by a sharp increase in unilateral economic measures imposed by the United States and its European allies.

While Western sanctions “have the claimed aim to end wars, protect human rights, or promote democracy,” the report shows they do the very opposite. By restricting a country’s ability to import essential goods like food, medicine, and medical supplies, and by slashing public budgets, sanctions systematically undermine healthcare systems and other vital services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saleh@feddit.org -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

By saying to deny medicine and food to a population you only make it more likely that you are perceived in the same way. It is wrong and nothing good comes out of starving and denying medical treatment to people.

EDIT: Wow, people now downvoting opposition to crimes against humanity.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We've been down this road with North Korea. If a country's leadership wants to burn the proverbial furniture and impoverish its people to fuel their war machine, no amount of foreign aid or trade is going to stop the impoverishment, because they will leverage it to offset spending to even more war.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no amount of foreign aid or trade is going to stop the impoverishment

The whole reason why israel didn't collapse is that we keep sending them billions to finance occupation and genocide

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which needs to stop and Israel must be sanctioned both militarily and economically. Still doesn't justify denying them access to food and medicine.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Israel csn produce them by themselves

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Fuck off, there's only room for hate on Lemmy. You just have to make sure it's directed at the other guys*.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A strong majority of russians are genocidal imperialists.

An overwhelming majority are broadly supportive of imperialism (on top of the strong majority that are openly genocidal).

The vast majority of russian consider "human rights" to be polemical tool to help forward their aims of genocidal imperialism.

And please don't bring up "They are all afraid! They actually all oppose putin!" There are well established methodologies for evaluating preference falsification (who could have thought?) and they've been applied to multiple research topics with respect to attitudes of russian society. The results are damning. With respect to the annexation of Crimea, which has had consistent support at around ~85% for 7-8 years of polling, preference falsification has been estimated to be a mere 1%, i.e. it is completely irrelevant.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't see why this is relevant to the question of whether one should commit crimes against humanity or not. There is no justification for denying food and medicine to people.

By seeking justifications for that, you end up becoming like the people you claim to fight against. They will tell you the exact same thing as to why their crimes would be justified.

There is no justification for denying food and medicine to people. No matter what they think. No matter what they did. It is a line you cannot cross without destroying your own humanity.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What a childish take. Russia is major exporter of grain, blocking all food exports to russia is not "denying food to people".

Same with medicine, you're acting as if russia has no internal production of medicine. Blocking all exports of medicine to a group where the overwhelming majority wish you harm is very much justified.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you know that Russia is able to produce all necessary medicine? You know that Russia is producing all the food necessary?

Vice versa you say Russia is a major exporter of grain. Should that be prohibited then? What about the countries that buy that grain?

And again, by following this line, you give the justification for other countries to do the same. They will claim the same about "wishing you harm" and frankly if you say they shouldn't receive any medicine, it is based in reality. Running this race to the bottom will only harm humanity and not just people in Ukraine and Russia.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Perfect example of performative "humanism".

Making claims about starvation, yet too fucking lazy to make a simple web search (on a topic with extremely detailed statistics that are even often reported in mainstream business news).

See, for you the russians invading Ukraine, engaging in mass killings, rapes, castration of POWs, stealing children, sending people who speak Ukrainian to torture camps is not a big deal. You don't consider it to be wrong.

I consider it to be wrong. When a society supports such actions (somewhere between a strong majority to an overwhelming majority as per the more conservative approach possible), ignoring that is de facto supporting their actions. Which is what you are doing.

So don't even try to play the faux-humanism card. I am not buying it for a second.