this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

games

20986 readers
297 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Scripts: Remove PKGBUILD

I originally provided this an alternative to the broken AUR packages.

However, it seems that Arch users would rather use broken packages and keep complaining to me instead of their packager. I specifically forbid packages for DuckStation (see README.md), and there's no way to request removal of these packages without handing my details over to a distribution I want nothing to do with.

So this is step one. Next step will be removing Linux support entirely, because I'm sick of the headaches and hacks for an operating system that only compromises 2% of the userbase, and I don't even use myself. But I'm hoping the Linux community will be reasonable, because as someone giving up my free time and not being compensated in any way, I shouldn't have to deal with this.

Just grep the source for "wayland" and you'll see what I mean.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The current license does not allow that. It saw hostile relicensing a year ago https://vimuser.org/duckstation.html

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

who gives a fuck about the license?
the source is there, nothing is stopping people from forking it except a markdown document

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

who gives a fuck about the license?

the license actually is what permits distributions to package Duckstation and spread it to more people. What this credit to society did was go scorched earth on everyone who worked with him because of his crash out.

Funny enough that the AUR is just a script to download and package duckstation, he literally has no legal basis to take the script down because his license doesn't actually apply.

Stenzeck is a loser who hurt everyone who cared while the people who victimized him dont give a shit.

[–] machinya@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago

this would be very similar to pirating game, which is totally fine for me but in practice is very hard to form a community around writing code for it. i doubt someone would enforce the license in a "pirated" fork but still many open source devs trust and comply with licences to some extend

[–] casskaydee@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

who gives a fuck about the license?

The legal system, unfortunately

[–] LargeAdultRedBook@hexbear.net 5 points 5 days ago

IP lawyers are usually too expensive for non corporate entities to wield. Is this dev willing to put 400K of his money where his mouth is?...signs point to no.

[–] Soot@hexbear.net 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Always the same story - If the software isn't free, then your use of it is legally bound to the random whims of some guy. Fingers crossed a fork from pre-hostile licensing takes over.

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago

Shit, I didn't know he did that. The kinds of nerds who use Linux are exactly the kinds of nerds who use emulators, so either way it's a baffling choice to turn actively hostile on them.