this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
53 points (90.8% liked)
Asklemmy
49665 readers
797 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Google has too much power and control. Even if I don’t have power and control of all my data, someone else having that power instead of Google is still preferable to leaving it all in their hands.
Break it up into many small pieces that do not like eachother.
They're evil, but not so sure giving some to meta to Amazon or similar would be better..
It absolutely is. Even if it’s going from one super villain to another, even if that’s still not a great outcome, it’s better than letting ONE corporation have all the power.
Your data is valuable. Let them fight over it.
I believe Meta is worse than google with private data
At least Google makes something good out of it, sometimes, maybe
Meta and amazon don't really bring us anything good
That is certainly true. But my point still stands. Never give one party all the power.