this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
35 points (94.9% liked)

Science

5008 readers
86 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The study revealed that, while transparency about good news increases trust, transparency about bad news, such as conflicts of interest or failed experiments, decreases it.

Yes, that's generally how a Bayesian agent would determine the extent to which an institution is trustworthy. A failed attempt to hide "bad news" would be stronger evidence that an institution is not trustworthy than a frank admission is, but that frank admission is still a reason to revise one's estimate of trustworthiness downwards.

[โ€“] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The missing piece is that hiding bad news should be harder. For example, if you're a researcher and all you claim from your research are the good news, people (and the ideal Bayesian agent) should immediately suspect "maybe they're hiding the bad news".