this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
151 points (99.3% liked)

news

24207 readers
656 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something like only the top 1% of performers make a livable wage, with an even smaller percent getting "retire at 23" money. While previous websites (like Backpage and Craigslist) were more exploitative/dangerous, OnlyFans and its knockoffs sell the illusion of a better lifestyle and easy money, when the reality is you're making less than Uber drivers.

And since anything on the internet is there forever, you can easily lose control of your content (which runs into issues like revenge porn, consent, etc.). We still live in a world that shames sex workers, so having all your stuff out there can impact future jobs. How much responsibility OnlyFans has to protect its creators' content is still undecided like all gig work.

It's shitty that someone could post their nudes and make all of $50, never move up the ladder, move on to a different career, then get fired from their teaching job ten years later because those photos surfaced.

This is also a very American-centric view on my part. Conditions and attitudes towards sex work are obviously going to be different in China. I do think making money on that platform isn't as easy as advertised and misleads a lot of sex workers about how money is earned. They also don't get health insurance/benefits, either, because it's like Lyft and Doordash.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I knew a girl who had an OF and made OK money out of it, enough to to pay rent while she was in college basically.

There was still a reddit community dedicated to posting her photos, with multiple thousands of subscribers. She didn't get paid for any of that traffic, and Reddit didn't let her file a DMCA to take down a community dedicated to posting her stolen work.

She had to file individual requests for each post that was on there, at least that was the case the last time I spoke to her.

[–] LargeAdultRedBook@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

She didn't get paid for any of that traffic, and Reddit didn't let her file a DMCA to take down a community dedicated to posting her stolen work.

She had to file individual requests for each post that was on there, at least that was the case the last time I spoke to her.

Bro trust me. It's totally not exploitative bro.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 5 days ago

Nah some zionist stealing 30% of the $30 you made in subscription fees this month so he can donate it to the IOF is totally not exploiting you bro