this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
195 points (94.5% liked)

memes

16478 readers
2605 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Show transcript3 panel meme. First panel: "I made a new internet slang". Second panel: "New or misused AAVE?" Third panel: "Misused AAVE".

the other 20% is either 4chan incel language or something trump tweeted in 2017

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If enough people used “green” to refer to “red” objects, the meaning of the word would change.

See: inversion of the meaning of the word “literally”

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

See: inversion of the meaning of the word “literally”

That's a great example of a word being misused. If the way a word is used makes its meaning less clear than before, it's being misused. Since "literally" can now mean "figuratively," you don't know how a person means it without additional information. If a new word came about to mean the opposite of "figuratively," all well and good, but without it, meaning is being objectively obfuscated. Another word that suffered this fate is "nonplussed," which means "being so surprised and confused a person doesn't know how to react," but is commonly used to mean "unperturbed," its opposite. Because of this, it's usually recommended to just not use it at all, because nobody can be sure what it's supposed to mean.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This can even happen to technical terms, for example bimonthly now has both the original meaning of once every 2 months, and also means semimonthly, twice a month.

In other words it's completely worthless as a word because it fails to specify between conflicting meanings.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

"Biweekly" and "biannually" have the same problem. I guess the terms have stuck because the dates they're referring to are usually specified as well. It's not much help to only know that something will happen at some point within a week, month, or year. "Okay, but when, exactly?"

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 4 points 4 days ago

And if not enough people use it that way, it remains wrong, which is what appears to be the point of the above comment

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I was imagining in my example that "green" might be adopted to mean red only in certain contexts, like used ironically or humorously to mean red, not in a way that erased or overrode the word's general meaning as green. This is to match the symmetry of misused words like gyatt that continue to have their original meaning and use, but get warped into a new meaning through misuse and then adoption of that misuse in a certain context, such as among white children on Fortnite.

As opposed to a complete inversion or change of the meaning of the word such that "green" would no longer mean green anymore but only mean red (this of course could still happen, it just wasn't the kind of case I was trying to illustrate).