this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
803 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

15874 readers
2201 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you were using nonstandard analysis with dx an infinitesimal you could put it outside I guess. Maybe with differential forms too?

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

In the context of differential forms, an integral expression isn't complete without an integral symbol and a differential form to be integrated.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Switch it with a summation operator and see if it makes sense. The problem isn't the operation by itself, but the fact that the operator implies an argument application, like a function.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

In the case of dx as an infinitesimal it makes sense. You are making a sum of all the values of the function in the integral range and multiplying with a constant dx.