this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
87 points (98.9% liked)
chapotraphouse
13922 readers
655 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
~~disengage~~
I shouldn't make jokes about an important rule, I'm sorry to you, any readers and db0 himself.
I'm trying to work on developing empathy and healthy coping skills for my cluster b
No, if you were going to post like db0, you would say that you don't actually care that much, that your opposition is the one who are mad, post a wall of text saying as much, while also insulting the level of intelligence of the person you are talking to, then end that post with 'disengage' thus abusing the rule.
You can't do anymore damage to the rule than db0 has already done himself.
Be that as it may I'll talk with the !neurodiverse@hexbear.net and !disabled@hexbear.net mods/users to explore making a discussion post on what the mod team could do better to support our ND comrades and combat ableism.
Thanks for the comment
Let me preface this by saying that, from what I have seen in screenshots, there was no ableism against db, db was just not taking care of themself by compulsively replying and getting mad at people replying to their replies, like it's "ableism" to not let someone have the last word.
Which makes it really gross that they are taking the real complaints hexbears have had about the broader HB culture and cynically weaponized it by distorting the very concept of ableism. The real complaints that I've seen are almost the inverse, which are that certain comrades, particularly ones on a certain part of the spectrum, get labeled as "debate bros" and otherwise disparaged, getting comments deleted, sometimes even getting banned, when basically what happened was that they disagreed and were failing to let it go. There is such a thing as a "debate bro," and we encounter them here often enough, but it can also effectively become a progressive-sounding way of saying "this autist keeps participating in this argument and I don't feel like either engaging in good faith or ignoring it, so I'm going to just say they are a (white?) male chauvinist who is obliged to give me the last word."
I've seen this complaint from at least three or four different people, though I think most of them aren't around anymore.
I really want to try and make a post for users to communicate this to us so we can make a concrete plan for remedying this, I'm talking to the !neurodiverse@hexbear.net and !disabled@hexbear.net mods on the best way to go forward. Thanks for the comment
I have complete confidence that you care and want to make things better, I just wanted to mention it while I was thinking about it.