this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
351 points (90.2% liked)

Science Memes

15622 readers
2071 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cruxifux 9 points 5 days ago (7 children)

If you eat more plants and animals and less breads and sugars you do lose weight and feel better. I’m no science guy but that does work. People over complicate this shit.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You're over complicating this shit.

Weight loss is primarily just calories burned minus calories eaten...

(times some factor, plus/minus some constant, ignoring higher order terms, excluding exogenous variables, etc.)

[–] Cruxifux 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah that’s a good rule too. Calories in vs calories out.

[–] fox@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's mostly the plants tbh, dietary fiber is frequently ignored in macro discussions but absolutely critical

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

fiber is so strange because it's function is basically just to pass through you, and yet it's so vital for the digestive system to function properly

everyone keeps saying "oh dietary supplements are just pissing away money" but fibre supplements are the one supplement most people would benefit hugely from taking, just get some psyllium husk or whatever and enter toilet nirvana

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just for context, it's a uniquely American problem. The rest of the developed world on average eats more balanced diet and don't need to supplement fiber.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The uniquely US problem is poor people having terrible diets, but lack of fibre for non-poor people is a thing all over the world aside from maybe like, japan..

i've personally benefitted greatly from just opting for whole-grain versions of things like pasta, much better poops now.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 days ago

Some people around the world eat what is sometimes known as "american diet", but it's not a norm yet, not everywhere.

[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

I no longer trust anyone who talks about “plants” or “animals”. It turns out, every single plant or animal is doing something different!

If it copies like a pasta, it’s copypasta!

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How is bread and sugar not plants?? Oversimplifying stuff doesn't make it better...

[–] Cruxifux 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Say whatever you want but you can’t argue with results my man.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 0 points 2 days ago

Well, if it works for you, great. But that doesn't mean that it will work for anyone else.

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

well, besides that other remark, sugars come from plants, though not all sugars are equal (ahem added sugar; fruit sugars are prolly fine)

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago

fruit sugars are prolly fine

Fruits in general aren't as good for you as general thinking have them. The majority have been bred to be so exaggerated in their sugar content that, as an example, you can't feed pet primates fruit very often or they will get diabetes (without getting into the horrors that keeping primates as pets encompasses). You can quickly get an idea of this by searching for 'wild strawberries vs grocery strawberries.'

The fibrous parts of fruits is good, the 'nutritional' aspects of them are decent, but the absolute black-hole-mass of sugar on the one side of the teeter-totter is a pretty big negative for them.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

This is some ignorant shit, you.