this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
45 points (95.9% liked)

askchapo

23056 readers
126 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

many of these states and their governments are openly hostile to communist elements, but a communist party actively opposing their government would risk destabilising it and then playing themselves directly into the hands of the imperialist states. an indefinite "united front" would be desirable, especially in countries like iran, but it seems all leftist organisations in these states have either decided to fully support the government in everything, becoming controlled opposition (KPRF in Russia) or western puppets like (MEK) or whatever the fuck the "leftist opposition" in russia, belarus is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

Give me one united front that didn't end in thousands of murdered communists. There's no common ground with the bourgeoisie, ever. These countries being strong opponents to the imperialist force of the USA shouldn't be an excuse for communist parties to stray away from their revolutionary goal. Sure, maybe don't start a revolution in the case that your country is actively defending against an imperialist war, but revolutionary action and uncompromising theory should never stop in the hope that the capitalists will respect a common interest. Their real enemy is and will always be the working class.