this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
45 points (95.9% liked)

askchapo

23056 readers
116 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

many of these states and their governments are openly hostile to communist elements, but a communist party actively opposing their government would risk destabilising it and then playing themselves directly into the hands of the imperialist states. an indefinite "united front" would be desirable, especially in countries like iran, but it seems all leftist organisations in these states have either decided to fully support the government in everything, becoming controlled opposition (KPRF in Russia) or western puppets like (MEK) or whatever the fuck the "leftist opposition" in russia, belarus is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] woodenghost@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Some section of the domestic bourgeois in colonized countries always has the option to betray their nation by becoming comprador capitalist that represent outside imperialists interests. The working class doesn't have that option, so there is still a fundamental class divide. But the capitalist class is also devided in that case and there might be temporary alliances with the capitalists who aren't compradors to fight for national liberation as a prerequisite for revolution.

[โ€“] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

thats my country in a nutshell.

our burgeoise is the opposite of anti imperialist.