this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
520 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

12185 readers
1046 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'll give you my uneducated findings: self driving cars are not ready.

I doubt they will ever be really ready, they'll eventually be considered "ready enough" no software will always work without flaws. When that software controls a car a minor flaw might mean 20 deaths.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Isn't Waymo in San Francisco completely self driving? And if their own recently released data is anything to go by, it would seem self driving cars are more ready than manually controlled cars. Because people are absolutely awful at driving.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Comparing self driving cars to American driving standards is kinda a moot point because the american safety standards are so low that death and injury is considered the cost of doing business.

I'd be curious to see how well waymo performs compared to a country with far safer road designs and drivers that are better trained and respect rules of the road more frequently.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Waymo cars use much better technology than Tesla.

Nobody is disputing that a machine that is never distracted and has reaction times down to fractions of a second would make a better driver than even the most skilled human, but Tesla's FSD hardware and software aren't there yet and probably never will be.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Way is also operating in a fairly small fixed area that is highly mapped.

Not saying that's a bad thing, they are doing things the right way, slowly and cautiously.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

40.000 deaths by traffic accident by year (in the US). Only 20 deaths would be a major improvement. Obviously "cars" is a highly irrational discussion though.

And it's not just the victims who could be spared their lives, it's also the mental toll on those who kill people on accident. Blaming it on a flaw in the software that can be improved and flaws permanently fixed is great.

I say let the mechanized reduced slaughter begin!

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Not unless government adjust infrastructure to accomodate. Like, QR codes on every sign giving each car passing specific instructions or whatever.