this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
1614 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

8330 readers
2008 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

“Imagine how much worse it would have been if it was women?”

(edit:)
— voters who choose GOP

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

~~Why do you choose to be a misogynistic dick when you could just shut your mouth?~~

Alright, Gotcha, and I appreciate your position

The written word is tricky, it loses nuance

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, your response was entirely appropriate for actual misogyny. Sorry for the false alarm.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's great to see healthy interactions here

It's so much better than the cesspit of neckbeards that is reddit!

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t normally upvote shit like…

But this, I upvoted everyone because I saw the whole fallout afterward and I like the interaction.

“Oops no fr I fucked up not indicating I was joking”

“Oh cool that’s all? Nbd.”

I’m here for that shit: if that’s what Lemmy was as a whole, the world would be a better place, legit.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damned right

I think we forget to reinforce the positive, because we're so used to being negative

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It helps, here on Lemmy, that there is no financial incentive to promote users being absolute shitheads; unlike certain other social media outlets (i.e. all of them).

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Even the neckbeards are leaving reddit now

It's mostly just bots

You can't even be sure you're arguing with real idiots anymore, there's a decent chance you're just arguing with a prompt spat out by Claude or one of the GPTs intending to get you arguing in the comments

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

~~I can't imagine.
Can you mansplain?~~

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

cheers, I abhor the '/s' tag, but it would have clicked here.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Used to be that satire could be understood or determined from the context but not now. Satire is policy for some people. Always need to use /s to show that you are sane and rational.

[–] LiveLoveLaff@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Helps many neurodivergents follow and chuckle along

POV: When you attempt sarcasm without the tag: ⬆️

[–] R3D4CT3D@midwest.social -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

misogynist w a female cat? hmmm

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I’m proud that the misogyny was called out so quickly and strongly. It should never be tolerated.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t elect you for any reason whatsoever.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If those "s were already in your comment, you shouldn't have needed it :/ satire on the internet is getting harder to make I guess

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not just satire on the internet, it's satire anywhere. It is now very clear that a good proportion of the public actually are that bad, so it is hard to tell if the person making the statement is saying it satirically or is actually one of those people

[–] LiveLoveLaff@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

While thats also true, Im talking about reading comprehension, not Poe's Law.

If you're using "s, it indicates that it's not something you're actually saying. You're quoting somebody else, including a hypothetical person that you're satirising. It's explicitly saying they're not your real words.

That's an issue of reading skill, and while we can certainly work to make writing more accessible for those that aren't great at it, I don't appreciate how people blame the writer for the treatment they receive for what is, at best, a mutual misunderstanding.

It's gotten bad enough that I can say in the comment the person I am satirising, and again in a concluding statement. But without the '/s', people still accuse me of being a monster for believing a heinous thing I deliberately used provocative language to describe.