this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
159 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

73495 readers
3218 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Horrendous that this isn't just a browser setting that can be applied universally. It's 100% opt out every time.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ublock Origin has that option!

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Settings, filter list, cookie notices

[–] Overspark 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's unnecessary. Not clicking anything is legally identical to opting out. So just install uBO and add the cookie list filter and block those annoying banners entirely.

[–] Overspark 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong, but in my experience those lists cause some sites to not work anymore, the whole site will stay dark waiting for the cookie pop-up for example, or you can't scroll. I still use uBO to block ads but Consent-O-Matic gives me a better experience on those sites.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did you try to dismiss then manually or use the filter list?

[–] Overspark 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Disabling uBO, dismissing the cookie pop-up and then re-enabling uBO usually works, but is a lot more work than just running Consent-O-Matic in the background.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You didn't answer my question. Do you have to cookie list filtered in uBO or are you just using the default list?

[–] Overspark 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was using the cookie lists but I stopped using them due to the aforementioned problems.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have it, and it does help, but it seems more often than not I still get a pop up for cookies.

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

You can report websites that it failed to act upon in the extension window

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, it could have been but just like robot.txt everyone ignored the Do-not-track Header in HTTP requests.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's why I leave this off. Ironically the "Do Not Track" signal is used to more effectively track you.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Similarly, the federal Do Not Call list, used to stop domestic spammers from calling you, is used by international spammers as a source of known active phone numbers to call. Because you need to actively add yourself to the list, so it’s a pretty solid list of active phone numbers. And the list is only enforced domestically, so all of the callers from overseas know they’ll never be prosecuted for using it.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

That mistake I did make. God knows no one pays attention to this list, domestic or abroad. I talked to an attorney and he said they have to call you several times for it to be a violation.