this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
219 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

70031 readers
4371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schnokobaer@feddit.org 20 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

enabled by default

But it's clunky somehow. After having it enabled for years I recently received a new SIM from my carrier and with that new physical SIM it just told me my carrier doesn't support RCS. That's it, no way to configure it or something. Just no, doesn't do. The same carrier that did support it the day before mind you. And it didn't work for a couple of weeks, then when I had already forgotten about it, it enabled itself over night or something.

And possibly for similar reasons I know people where from one day to another the chat falls back to SMS and I have confirmed with them that they are on the same phone and contract etc... we both have no idea why RCS stopped working for them.

Like this, it isn't really mass marketable imo.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Yea, RCS requires both the carrier and Google's systems to inter-operate. Meanwhile, Apple's iMessage only requires Apple to work with themselves.

Google could theoretically build a Google Messages counterpart to iMessage and skip the Carrier as the middleman, but then it wouldn't be interoperable with iPhones since it wouldn't be an "open standard"

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Google could theoretically build a Google Messages counterpart to iMessage and skip the Carrier as the middleman, but then it wouldn’t be interoperable with iPhones since it wouldn’t be an “open standard”

Google did that, in 2013. Hangouts was briefly the default SMS client on Android, and it would upgrade conversations from SMS to its protocol when available. It was available for iPhone, but couldn't be an SMS client there.

Rumor has it, carriers whined about it, and Google caved out of fear they would promote Windows Phone devices instead. I think that was a foolish move on Google's part, but I think I'm glad Google doesn't own a dominant messaging platform.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't need a carrier to be an open standard.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

The current standard requires carriers to make it work.

Maybe someone needs to make a new RCS without needing carriers to also do anything. Because if we are relying on carriers to implement something, its likely they'll not get implemented for decades.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Surely Google wouldn’t put an untested, buggy technology directly into production?!?!

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

I've been using it for years to chat with people on a bunch of different carriers... Seems like carrier incompetence, not Google's fault

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I don't think this is a Google thing.

We have working cross-carrrier RCS in Ukraine. No one uses it though.