this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
1643 points (96.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

7623 readers
2322 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The really ugly thing here is, al-Sharaa is the best thing to happen to Syria in decades. Most people have been urging recognition of his government and the relaxation of sanctions because he's about as good we can expect a leader of Syria to be.

And he is still bribing Trump.

This isn't merely corruption. This is the *normalization * of corruption. Even countries that abide by democratic norms and international law are going to need to grease palms to conduct regular diplomatic relations. The EU and UK and Canada might be able to weather his bullshit until he folds like he always does, but developing nations will be stuck trying to bid for American favor.

Welcome to the Chinese century.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

al-Sharaa is the best thing to happen to Syria in decades

Could we please stop? He's a jihadist saying pleasant things to Europeans and Americans with nobody caring whether they are true.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Everyone in Syria is facing their own personal jihad - best of luck to them.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The louder the west screams about him being a Jihadist, the more I trust him to do the right thing in Syria

[–] sudo@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Good instincts and all but he always been a hard core salafist. Leftists were calling him that all last year. Its just now that Trump's in power liberals can pretend that they were always against him.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The west doesn't scream. The west condemned Alawites for not liking to be massacred.

And this is stupid. Inverted signal is the same signal, just inverted. It's not independence of thought.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The west condemned Alawites for not liking to be massacred

Hmmm, are you sure about that? I feel like there was a notable party using that event as justification for crossing over the Syrian boarder but maybe that was a fever dream

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like your last paragraph ignores my last paragraph.

One of the reasons Israel is so fucking hated by all ME smaller groups is because it casually pretends to maybe this time possibly protect them, and usually does nothing of the sort, causing more ruin.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

I feel like your last paragraph ignores my last paragraph.

Your last paragraph was kind of meaningless

One of the reasons Israel is so fucking hated by all ME smaller groups is because it casually pretends to maybe this time possibly protect them, and usually does nothing of the sort, causing more ruin.

.... I mean kinda? Israel has been a belligerent anti-arab neighbor since 1948 and has caused nothing but ruin. There's a hell of a lot more reason for their distrust of Israel than their choices of proxy militant groups.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's at least trying to put on a facade of meaning them, which is about as good as Syria has had it in my life time.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, he isn't. He's worse than Assad, the reason nobody says Assad was better is because Assad directly caused this by killing opponents, disarming strong parties (which could have resisted jihadists) and in general destroying the country. So he's worse than Assad, but a direct consequence of Assad.

I'm certain he's more consistent than Assad and eventually this leads to a more stable and economically viable Syria. Note how I'm not saying anything about human rights and civilization.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's pretty hard to be worse than the guy whose used nerve has on his own people and turned his country into a major producer for the international drug trade.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

You just have to be the guy who turned a half-Sunni, half-Alawi city on the coast into half-Sunni, half-dead. Then after calls for stopping the murders and loads of videos with dead men, women and children he ... forbid filming that.