this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
175 points (95.8% liked)

memes

14397 readers
2375 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
175
AI software (lemmy.world)
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by xpostml10@lemmings.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

What? Who are we in this case? Because we as a community do know how to. The question is does our Stakeholders know that it may cost more and do they even care?

So it circles back to the meme. Does the vibe coder care if the AI Slop is maintainable, safe and secure? Or does they even know how to spot it?

[–] vzq@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

What? Who are we in this case? Because we as a community do know how to. The question is does our Stakeholders know that it may cost more and do they even care?

This really pisses me off. Do you think civil engineers would build unsafe bridges because “stakeholders” told them to? No, because they would go to fucking jail.

We are a fucking disgrace. We need software liability laws because apparently we can’t stand up for ourselves and our profession.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago

Do you think civil engineers would build unsafe bridges because “stakeholders” told them to? No, because they would go to fucking jail.

sure the first iteration of the bridge would be up to spec as they need to be inspected first to be approved. So the Stakeholders would do anything to get it done, buuuuuuut maybe not with the best materials and the best engineers/workers but certainly on time in mind.

But afterwards? when it comes to maintaining the bridge; eeeh, its good enough, here a patchwork; who cares if there are potholes everywhere, you can still use it right?

We are a fucking disgrace. We need software liability laws because apparently we can’t stand up for ourselves and our profession.

Can't really stand up when CEOs constantly lay off teams. So why would one guy who stands up for what is just and right matters to them?