Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
view the rest of the comments
Definitely an unpopular opinion, and not just a rant or rage bait either, so kudos!
I don't agree, but this is a damn fine post for this C/
The reason I don't agree is that consumer goods are priced out of scale. It they can't price things at a realistic level, then they should stop making them. That goes for every single brand/platform out there
If they're going to be sucking at the teat of capitalism and enjoying massive profits, but the rest of us are struggling as households, they can go fuck themselves, to be frank. They want the benefits of a "free" market, but don't want to recognize that the market pressure of demand actually matters. If they're making games that aren't affordable to the median, then that's the developers' problem. They can scale back for a while, change pricing, produce fewer games, whatever. They have options.
Now, yes, it's games. This isn't insulin we're talking about here, so it certainly isn't something anyone needs to be up in arms over. But it also isn't something where they need defending either. Fuck em if they can't play fair.
While I agree in principle (I'm not a fan of unfettered capitalism either) the fact is that people need to vote with their wallets. As the business saying goes: "things are worth what people will pay for it"
People are going to buy the switch 2, I expect they won't be able to supply enough to stock stores sufficiently on launch just like the last couple console launches. Games are going to sell and they are going to make a profit. If people want to make a statement that it's unaffordable they need to organise a large boycott or potentially a general strike to enact change in the market as a whole; which I don't see happening(sadly).
So again while I do agree that late stage capitalism and the fact that buying power is at a long time low is a huge issue. I do not think that Nintendo following the other big game consoles pricing is surprising nor on its own unethical. I find the huge uproar that they are joining PlayStation and Microsofts pricing range to be a bit much. Under our current economic structure Nintendo has a fiscal responsibility to be profitable to their shareholders, I'm sure there's a ton of pressure on them to follow market pricing.
I definitely see your point, and appreciate you expressing it :)