this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
727 points (98.0% liked)

Not The Onion

15614 readers
2702 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They were both drunk. She was more drunk.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 10 points 15 hours ago

Thanks for pointing this out.

He claims that he asked her several times if she consented and that he had been given the impression that she did.

Seems like it was more of an "unintentional rape", like manslaughter is unintentional murder. Wrong: yes. Bad judgment: yes. Deliberate malice: maybe not.

[–] farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

yeah i fail to see how this is rape. i guess every drunken hookup we later regret is a rape

If your definition of every drunken hookup is, that they are unable to stand on their own...

[–] ihatefascist@lemm.ee -5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So you like to fuck lifeless bodies? Fucking necrophile 🤢

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee 0 points 13 hours ago

They are cold, unless you are in time

[–] SirQuack 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

She was unable to walk-drunk, he got her home.
This guy wants to be a gynaecologist for fucks sake.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

what does gynaecology have to do with this?

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Really?
You don't see a problem with this guy being alone in a room with a woman in a vulnerable position having her genitals touched?

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If there's a problem with him being a doctor, he shouldn't be a doctor. The idea that vaginas are somehow especially vulnerable is mysticism.

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't think you understand the problem here.