this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
1400 points (99.4% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

1480 readers
401 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rippersnapper@lemm.ee 83 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It’s been pretty clear for sometime that in the US laws don’t apply equally to everyone.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should. But when the Supreme Court is corrupt, this is what happens.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's all courts, let's not pretend it was different for most people 10 years ago.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But the Supreme Courts dictate lower courts

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I know, but (1) most lower court actions and decisions are never reviewed by SCOTUS and (2) it's not like the lower courts were doing great and every once in a while SCOTUS overturned them. This has long, long been a been a very consistent and pervasive problem in the federal courts. It's not as simple as "SCOTUS pulls the strings of the lower courts," quite far from it.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I didn't say they pull the strings. I said they dictate it. They set precedence. Which is huge in the interpretation of law.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There were two immigrant teenagers murdered in NYC the same day as Thompson. Nobody cared in the slightest.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 16 hours ago

Obviously not. As we've already ascertained from OP, one murder of a rich is worth more than 23 murders of non-white commoners. A mere 2 non-citizen commoners isn't going to make them blink an eye.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

And just think of the media circus if the world didn't like and support Luigi the more they hear about him, they tried a blitz at first and it just helped Luigis popularity.. so this is the silent mode.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Serial killers like Ted Bundy, state charges. Even though he crossed several states. Yet this has federal charges for some reason.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

"For some reason". I'd go with "For removing a useful tool of the Oligarchs"

[–] YummyEntropy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Circa 1776, more specifically.