this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23024 readers
202 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Obviously capitalism bad, but it bought greater production, technological advance, medicine, and treats for the lucky. I just wonder if 15th century serfs in France got any material benefit from owing most of their harvest to the lord. Did Baron Scrotumface help them make better plows and scythes, or was it all just expropriation?

This is a very low effort question because I'm tired from work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

Feudalism was a step up from the slave economies of the previous era, but not by much. While peasants and serfs had more rights than slaves (such as being able to own property of their own), they were still at the whims of the nobility.

Also, slavery still existed, so it's not like any progress made a difference for the slave populations across the globe. Even as feudalism gave way to capitalism in the American south, the form of slavery practiced there was especially brutal when compared to other slavery practices elsewhere.

I'd have to go look it up, but IIRC slave economies like Rome and Mali were at war more than fuedal societies that replaced them.