Linux

6830 readers

138 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

108

Torvalds Frustrated Over "Disgusting" Testing "Turd" DRM Code Landing In Linux 6.15 (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 5 days ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/linux@programming.dev

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The big set of open-source graphics driver updates for Linux 6.15 have been merged but Linux creator Linus Torvalds isn't particularly happy with the pull request. In particular, he's unhappy with some new "hdrtest" testing code being built as part of full kernel builds and the "turds" it leaves behind and this code "needs to die" at least from the perspective of non-DRM driver developers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 74 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Direct Rendering Manager, not Digital Rights Management

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

Thanks.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Digital ~~Rights~~ Restrictions Management

FTFY. Do not allow the enemy to frame the debate.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That's not what DRM is in kernel/hardware land

It stands for display rendering manager and it predates any of the other stuff.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I believe they were insinuating that "DRM" as in "Digital Rights Management" (as the comment they were replying to had spelled out) actually has nothing to do with "rights," and further that we shouldn't let companies reframe restrictions to the user as rights of the creator, not that the comment they replied to is wrong about which "DRM" is being referenced in relation to the kernel.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Precisely. I was pointing out that the accurate expansion of the acronym (in the context of copyright, not graphics rendering) is the one as explained in https://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm, not the self-serving loaded language pushed by the copyright cartel.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Thanks for the context!

[–] haakon@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't care, I don't want no damn Direct Rendering Manager, oh no siree.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

Who needs a display honestly. I just use a thin client running Windows 11

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago

all my rendering is done indirectly AT BEST