this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
288 points (99.0% liked)

politics

22535 readers
3665 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A security breach involving Trump’s national security team occurred when leaked Signal group chat revealed that Trump-appointed officials accidentally shared classified U.S. war plans with journalist Jeffrey Goldberg.

The chat included top officials like Pete Hegseth, JD Vance, Marco Rubio, and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz.

This breach raises concerns about using unclassified apps for sensitive data, violating laws on classified information and record retention.

The incident highlights the risks of appointing unqualified individuals to critical roles, echoing broader patterns of mismanagement during Trump's administration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

I've read that Hitler intentionally gave government-departments overlapping authority, so that they'd be in turf-wars, so whichever one "lost" could then be shut-down..

It wasn't incompetence, it was intentional: a means for force-dismantling government's function.

IF the point of having the incapable running the different departments .. is so that total-dictatorship later becomes "justified", then it is a strategem, not a mistake.

& differentiating between unconscious-strategems vs conscious ones ..

.. as an example of unconscious-tactics, I'm now certain that Hamas's strategem of using the lives of Palestine as bait, to get Israel to demonstrate its nihilism & sadism & narcissism & machiavellianism ( etc ) on, ..

.. so that in future, the entire-region wouldn't care what "deterrent" Israel had, .. that such a huge percentage of the region's population would be committed to annihilating Israel at ANY cost, .. that Israel's annihilation becomes inevitable..

.. was completely unconscious.

But it is effective.

I don't bet ANYthing on Israel existing, as a country, by 2029, now.

Trying to sort-out the .. bucket-of-vomit, which is what geopolitics now is .. with all its unconscious-strategems & insane tactics & sickening "values" ..

I'm betting that Trump will use the consequences-of-his-people's-incompetence to "justify" greater, & more-complete, highjacking of the US of A.

I absolutely do not believe it'll result in the Dems regaining the US:

that opportunity was thrown-away with the election that Biden wouldn't get out of, until it was too late to save.

  1. differentiating the convenient-to-the-left-belief isn't journalism, it is just more of the filter-bubble that cost the Dems the 2024 election.

  2. seeing such things not with the superiority/contempt of the left, but rather with the .. how is this going to be dealt with and adapted-to by the ruling-regime, how are they going to use this to further their highjacking? would be much closer to journalism.

  3. humans are mixtures of unconsciousness & consciousness, & much of our "tactics" and "strategy" is actually just unconscious-instinct & feelings-motivated stuff, so it doesn't matter whether it is unconscious or conscious, it doesn't matter whether it is contempted by so-and-so, or whether some caste/class of people are condescending about it, in Natural Selection, it only matters if it works. Pay attention to if it's viable-enough to continue taking our world down, not to what the upper-middle-class-left are saying while denigrating it.

( feel free to contempt everything I said here, but I'm sooo damn tired of filter-bubble making-believing substituting for the survival-stuff that humankind needs .. & every mistake made by anybody can be changed in significance by circumstance,

so the whole "they're failing, & we're going to be their 'daddy' when they do" narrative that much of the upper-middle-class left that I've seen is identifying in.. is just more ignoring/denying, with a price-tag counted in lives later this decade.

Pragmatism would be a good thing, now, & "it's only a won-game when it's completely finished" would also be good to live by. )

_ /\ _