this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
791 points (99.5% liked)

politics

21970 readers
4302 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A federal judge criticized a Trump administration Justice Department lawyer who claimed they didn't have to follow the judge's oral order blocking deportations to El Salvador because it wasn't in writing.

Judge Boasberg questioned why the administration ignored his directive to return immigrants to the US. The DOJ lawyer repeatedly refused to provide information about the deportations, citing "national security concerns."

Frustrated, Boasberg ordered sworn declarations explaining what happened, quipping that he would issue a written order "since apparently my verbal orders don't seem to carry much weight."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t disagree with you, but I think we both know how this will play out. Get ready to hide in the attic.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

yeah. fuck my life. taking bets on how long I last before they kill me. ill have betting tables up in the morning.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Hmmm… what color are you? Could be a matter of months… (hopefully not)

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder how long I'll survive as an Asian American...

Asian Americans are the smallest minority in the US, so that's not looking good. I'm wondering if the so called "Model Minority" sterotype would help (I mean like East Asians, specifically).

Philly btw. Hopefully Shapiro isn't fucking spineless like the rest of the dems (doubt), but like the federalism is really the only safeguard left.

[–] VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Get armed and look up your local Ironfront or indivisible chapter. You are not alone, United we stand. Divided we fall.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Indigenous aren't the smallest minority?

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think I count as 'swarthy' and white depending on the century.

but also I'm visibly queer and very loud about lefty politics.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm. Do you live in a blue state? I hope so. You might be able to blend. Can you—is this the fucking 90s?—“butch up” for the gestapo long enough to slip away? I’m having flashbacks of the Midwest.

For me, I’m a man married to a man. I’m on a list. I’m somewhat nervous about that, but I’m white like milk an own a lot of polos and chinos, so I will have some warning before the shit hits me. Fingers crossed.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

butch up

well I have tits, so I'm not sure that would help.

I'm more worried about a neighbor reporting me.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Oh, you’re fine. They love girl on girl. (Joke)

It’s always the fucking neighbors.