this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025

61 points (100.0% liked)

Buy European

3949 readers

2349 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

Matrix Chat

Rules:

Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.
Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:
Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
Do not spam or abuse network features.
Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

Related Communities:

Buy Local:

!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyafrican@baraza.africa

!buyFromEU@lemm.ee

!buyfromeu@feddit.org

Buying and Selling:

!flohmarkt@lemmy.ca

Boycott:

!boycottus@lemmy.ca

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:

!stopkillinggames@lemm.ee

Banner credits: BYTEAlliance

founded 1 month ago

MODERATORS

buyeuropean@feddit.org

lazycog@feddit.uk

Amazon refuses to take legal responsibility for consumer safety, Sues federal watchdog agency-Consumer Product Safety Commission;Argues it's not responsible for recalling items sold by third parties. (advocacy.consumerreports.org)

submitted 22 hours ago by Blaze to c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/27108135

In the suit, Amazon argues that the company should not have legal responsibility to recall and remedy consumers for unsafe products sold on its marketplace by third-party sellers. Amazon claims that it is just an intermediary and logistics provider for third-party sales, similar to a delivery service, not a distributor or retailer that has a legal responsibility to carry out recalls. The CPSC ordered Amazon to recall more than 400,000 unsafe products in July 2024, after more than three years of adjudication.

“Instead of demonstrating its commitment to consumer safety, Amazon has fought the CPSC every step of the way for more than three years, and now it’s going to court. The law is clear that Amazon is a ‘distributor’ in this case and must carry out a recall. It’s absurd to suggest that because a company hosts a marketplace online it should be exempt from sensible requirements that help get hazardous products out of people’s homes and prevent them from being sold. The court should reject Amazon’s arguments. Taking Amazon at its word would mean hazardous products slipping through the cracks, even when they are capable of injuring or killing people.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sirus@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I mean.... it's not. Why wouldn't you go to the product manufacturer? If someone sells you a car and there's a recall, you take it to the dealership to get fixed, not the person that sold it to you

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

If you purchase a dishwasher from Whirlpool, you don't go to them for a repair or returns, you go to the shop where you purchased it.

It is a complex situation and you are right about a car. But if you buy the car from a non branded dealer you would expect the dealer to assist.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

You realize you just negated your own point with the car example, right? Unless it's a Tesla, car dealers aren't owned by the manufacturer and (unless you buy used) are the place you bought it from.

Edit: I just realized what community this is in. To clarify, I'm talking about the way it works in the US -- I don't know how it works in Europe.

[–] HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Amazon is helping TimmiXyZ29 sell me a new washer. TimmiXyZ29 is not a certified salesman for Whirlpool Washers. Timmi is actually refurbishing old washers and selling them as new. My washer burns the house down. I think we all agree Timi is responsible, but where do I start?

The manufacture says they can't be responsible because Timi/Amazon aren't selling certified Whirlpool goods.
Timmi says he is just selling a product, it's not his fault
Amazon says they're just selling a product, it's not their fault

Now add an additional level; the order is fulfilled by Amazon. Timmi, Whirlpool and other sellers now give Amazon these washers, and Amazon keeps them in a communal pool and sends it on Timmis behalf. Now we don't even know where the original washer came from.

What if amazon deletes, hides, or deprioritized disparaging reviews that showed the product was dangerous, and you now buy it?

There's so many levels of possible problems that it can be hard to consistently ascribe blame to any one party when sold through amazon.

I do expect that if a party is selling goods that end up being dangerous, and users have consistently reported the failures/problems in amazon, amazon should perhaps be responsible if they did not block the seller/product or adequately raise awareness about the concern.

[–] courageousstep@lemm.ee 2 points 19 hours ago

This is a helpful perspective! Thanks!